Archive for October 16th, 2017

Critical Book Appraisal

write a critical appraisal of a book that you have recently read concerning one or more particular complementary and alternative medical therapies currently practised in Canada. The book you review should be at least 100 pages in length.
You should include the following sections:
1. Author(s). Provide information about the author(s), including credentials and academic, organizational, or institutional affiliation. Does the author have a bias or vested interest?
2. Introduction.What is the book about?
3. Claims. Does the book make any claims about treatment?
4. Supporting evidence.What scientific evidence does the author present to support his or her claims? Assess the literature in detail. Critically assess the research in relation to the book content.
5. Risks and benefits. Discuss and critically assess the risks and/or benefits associated with the particular therapy presented in the book.
6. Conclusion. Present your conclusion.
7. References. List and cite all sources of scientific literature that you used to write this assignment using APA style.

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High Quality Papers!

Karl Marx

On the file i have attached, i chose number one to write about, which is "compare and contrast the division of labor as discussed by Adam Smith, Emile Durkheim, and/or Karl Marx." However if you are more comfortable with another topic of those 12, then no problem. HAS TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF ARGUMENT. Times New Roman font, size 12. More direction are on the same file i have attached, but the main part is to talk about Karl Marx and what he thinks about the division of labor.

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High Quality Papers!

M8A1 Immigration

Each question has to be at least 750 words and primarly using the following references:

 

Miller, D. A. (Ed.). (2007). Illegal immigration

 

Jardins, J. (2017) "The New Colossus": Emma Lazarus and the Immigrant Experience"

 

Samsel, H., (2017) "Yes, Statue of Liberty poem is linked to immigration, says poet's"

 

Question 1:

        Immigrants and migrants in the US have been "pushed" out of their homelands for many different reasons and "pulled" toward the US for other reasons. Using three of the following immigrant groups, consider the commonalities and differences in the factors driving each group out of their homelands and toward the United States in the late 19th century through the 21st century: Russian Jews, African Americans (internal Great Migration), Mexicans, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Afghanis. Use specific information from the readings in describing the push and pull factors for each.

 

Question 2:

                                           

Compare the arguments used to restrict immigration today to those made in the 1920s and the 19th century. What did these nativist arguments express about American anxieties and values? To what extent were such fears rooted in the economy and to what extent were they cultural?

 

Question 3: 

Takaki stresses that the demographic change affecting American society now is momentous—the passing of an America in which being white was the norm and non-whites were minorities, to one where whites are only one of several major ethnic/racial groups. Will this change create more division or more unity? What impact will such a development have on American culture? Discuss the potential future of American society in the light of long-term trends in American history.

 

All sources should be cited and referenced in either APA or Chicago/Turabian format.

 

Each essay should include:

 

An introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement outlining your overall argument

Body paragraphs with specific evidence from sources

In-text citations and references in APA or Chicago/Turabian style

A conclusion paragraph that synthesizes the information you present and summarizes your main points

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

How do the words and inlustratations reinforce,contradict or change our interpretation of the meaning of a story within one or more of the works that we have read

How do the words and inlustratations reinforce,contradict or change our interpretation of the meaning of a story within one or more of the works that we have read. In other words what is the relationship between text and image.

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

Pick a Franciscan value and write an easy that answer this question

Pick a Franciscan value and write an easy that answer this question. To what extent does the value that you chose show up in a work of literature that we have read this semester some values are: diversity, peace, respect, services, and joy

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

Proposal to build gate for a housing development to stop crime in neighborhood

My proposal theme: Write a proposal to build a gate for the housing development to prevent crime in neighborhood

Current situation (S1): We do not have a anything preventing unauthorized people from accessing our neighborhood and committing crimes and it would be nice to have a gate to prevent access

Project Plan (S2): The plan is to build a gate two gates to prevent unauthorized people to gain access or entry to the neighborhood thus preventing crime.

Instructions:
Be between 2500-3000 words
Include your current situation, objectives, methods, qualifications, budget, and benefits
Make clear use of rhetorical appeals and decisions
Be appropriately written and designed for the rhetorical situation
Ethically cite in MLA or APA all research findings in-text and in a works cited page (at least 2 sources; sources must be credible)
Be culturally considerate

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

Should the withdrawal of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a heart failure patient be considered active euthanasia?

Ethical Questions
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance, the modeled examplePreview the documentView in a new window, and the outline provided.

Overview
The following assignment is an exercise designed to help you begin the process of addressing a moral issue, a process that will continue in the next two assignments. In this exercise, you will do the following:

Formulate an ethical question within one of the given topic areas from the list provided.
Provide an introduction in which you briefly explain the topic and the particular question on which you will focus your paper.
State your position on the question at issue.
Identify one consideration that would support your position and one consideration that would challenge it.
Instructions
The exercise must be at least 500 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Be sure to include a title page and, if you include references, a bibliography. The exercise should be in outline (not essay) format, with each part labeled and numbered as specified below.

Part One: Formulate the Question
Read through the list of available topic areas, and select a topic on which you would like to write your next two papers. Formulate a specific, concrete, ethical question pertaining to that topic, and place that at the top of your paper.

The question should be specific enough to discuss in six to eight pages (which is the length of the Final Paper assignment). For example, if you were interested in discussing the topic of capital punishment, a question like “Is capital punishment wrong?” would be too vague, and would need to be reformulated as a more specific question, such as “Should we execute people convicted of first degree murder?” or “Is it just to use capital punishment when there is the possibility of executing innocent persons?” or “Is the capital punishment system racist?”

Part Two: Provide a Brief Introduction to the Topic
Your introduction should focus on setting out the topic and scope of the discussion in a way that clearly establishes what exactly you will be talking about and why it is significant. It should also provide any necessary context such as the background, current state of affairs, definitions of key terms, and so on. You want to try to do this in a way that stays as neutral as possible, avoids controversial assumptions, rhetorical questions, and the like. In other words, you should try to construct an introduction to the topic that could be an introduction to a paper defending any position on the question at issue.

It is important for your introduction to narrow down the topic as much as possible. Doing so will allow you to provide a more detailed consideration of the issues and explain the reasoning more clearly in later papers. In general, arguments and analyses are much stronger when they focus on addressing a particular issue thoroughly and in detail, and doing so often requires deciding on one particular question or point to discuss, and leaving other possible ones aside.

You should label this section of your paper as “Introduction.”

Part Three: Provide a Position Statement
State clearly and precisely the position you intend to defend on the question you have formulated. This does not need to be more than one sentence.

Note that providing a position statement does not necessarily presume that you are confident in your position, that other positions do not have merit, or that you cannot change your mind later. However, for now, it is important to at least tentatively take a stand on a position you believe to be better supported than others.

Label this section as “Position Statement.”

Part Four: Identify and Explain a Supporting Reason
Identify and explain a plausible reason someone could give that supports the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explain why you think it supports that position. The explanation should aim to be three to five sentences (shorter explanations are possible, but will likely be inadequate; longer explanations are likely to be too verbose).

Label this section as “Supporting Reason.”

Part Five: Identify and Explain an Opposing Reason
Identify and explain a plausible reason someone might give that would oppose or challenge the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explain why you think it would oppose or challenge it. The explanation should aim to be three to five sentences (shorter explanations are possible, but will likely be inadequate; longer explanations are likely to be too verbose). You should strive to articulate that reason in a way that someone defending a contrary position to your own would do.

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

Classic English Literature Topic: Suicide

On my research proposal, I discussed how it could be prevented and depression is the main leading cause and I want to mention that on the research paper. one more thing, English is my 2nd language and I do not want u to use big vocab words because it will otherwise look like somebody else wrote it.prposal, I discussed how it could be prevented and depression is the main leading cause and I want to you to mention that on the research paper. one more thing, English is my 2nd language and I don't want u to use big vocab words because it will otherwise look like somebody else wrote it.

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

How technology balances privacy,autonomy

the recommended technologies mentioned in chapter 11 adequately balance privacy, autonomy, and dignity. Ch11 is from the book Geriatric Care Management 3rd edition by Cathy Jo Cress

Need a similar Essay? Click Order Now And Get A Qualified Writer For High-Quality Papers!

error: Content is protected !!