Human Resource Homework Help!

 Assignment 2: Job Analysis / Job DescriptionDue Week 4 and worth 100 points
Go to YouTube, located at http://www.youtube.com/, and search for an episode of “UnderCover Boss”. Imagine you are the CEO of the company in the selected episode.Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

1. Compare two (2) job positions from the episode and perform a job analysis of each position. 
2. Describe your method of collecting the information for the job analysis (i.e., one-on-one, interview, survey, etc.).
3. Create a job description from the job analysis.
4. Justify your belief that the job analysis and job description are in compliance with state and federal regulations.
5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. 

What were your favorite parts of the video?

What things did you learn from the video?

If you could discover a dinosaur mummy which dinosaur would you choose?

How does the video relate to this weeks Chapter on Ornithopoda?

And anything else from the video that you would like to discuss.

Question 34

Complete a research paper on the attached topic. Be sure to include the information listed on the attachment (problem, hypothesis, null hypothesis, literature review topics, and research design). It should include a cover page, an abstract, an introduction, a literature review, a methodology, and a reference page. Your final paper should be double-spaced, 8–10 pages in length, have at least six references, and properly edited.

Please use the following outline:

• Introduction (2–3 pages)
  • Introduction (including the statement of the problem)
  • Purpose of the study
  • Research question and hypotheses
  • Theoretical framework
  • Operational definitions
• Literature review (3 pages)
  • Introduction
  • Review of research topic (as covered by the literature)
  • Conclusion
• Methodology (3–4 pages)
  • Introduction
  • Research design
  • Participants
  • Instruments
  • Procedures
  • Data analysis
  • Limitations of the study (i.e., threats to validity)
  • Ethical issues
  • Dissemination strategy
  • Summary
• Reference page

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Week 5 – Journal

How Does This Relate to Me?

Prior to beginning this journal entry, read “First Language Acquisition” (pp. 198-204) and “Second Language Learning” (pp. 205-211) in your required text, as well as the required article, “Understanding Reading Anxiety: New Insights from Neuroscience.” It is important for you to have already completed your initial discussion posts before you complete this journal entry.

Part 1: As you were reading this week, what vocabulary was used that was unfamiliar to you or might be to your peers? Identify three to five words from this week’s content and research each word in the context of learning and cognition. Explain, in your own words, what each word means and how it is used in the context of learning and cognition.

Part 2: Based on the week’s discourse and content, you will access the Ashford University Library and research one scholarly article pertaining to “reading comprehension and second language” published within the last ten years. Provide a summary explanation of the findings in the context of your article. What implications should scholars consider based on this information? Support your explanation utilizing your course sources and your researched article.

Part 3: Consider the events from the past week of your life. How does the ability to read and write effectively affect our behaviors, actions, and knowledge development? Describe one personal real-life example of an occurrence that indicates the possible consequences when reading and writing acquisition are not well-developed or when language development creates boundaries, such as educational or employment opportunities. As you share this information, consider and apply the professional standards found in “12.06 Anonymity of Sources”found in the AERA Code of Ethics (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Each journal entry should be 400 to 700 words in length and should establish your understanding of the content, apply appropriate methods of ethical practices, and exhibit appropriate scaffolding of personal experience to the week’s content.

Psychology Paper- Decision Making

• Decision-Making
• Based on our content this week, discuss the importance of rationale decision-making in an organization, using necessary citations. Include how bounded reality, cognitive biases, and conjunction fallacy might affect decision-making.
• Attribution Theory
  • Explain attribution theory using necessary citations. Include a discussion about the effects of consistency, consensus, distinctiveness, and fundamental attribution error. Consider inclusion about the effects of perception, primacy and recency effects, selective perceptions, contrast effect, stereotyping to further support your discussion.
• Personal Experience: Inaccurate Judgement
  • Based on our content this week, consider your own experiences with others. Have your actions ever been judged inaccurately by a person such as a boss, a peer, or a family member? How could this experience support your thesis about whether or not attribution theory and bias affect human behaviors with organization?
  • Can self-serving, or other, bias affect one’s perception of a behavior?
• Creative Decision Making
  • Explain how creative decision-making can improve our ability to make better decisions, considering the numerous obstacles to do so. Include an analysis about how good decision making can potentially affect productivity and job satisfaction.

Writing considerations:

1. The introduction paragraph should introduce your topic and clearly explain what the paper will address.
2. Headings can be used to organize your information. See template. (Each heading should include at least two paragraphs – minimum.)
3. Each paragraph should make a point which can be linked back to your introduction paragraph. Design the topic sentence to embody what the paragraph will entail.
4. The most important consideration in the body paragraphs is the argument that you want to develop (is or is not perceptions, attribution theory and bias applicable?) in response to the topic (applicability of perception, attribution theory and bias). This argument is developed by making and linking points in and between paragraphs.
5. The conclusion paragraph should restate your thesis (your suggestion that perceptions, attribution theory and bias does or does not apply to human behaviors in organizations.)

Your assignment should be a minimum of five to six double-spaced pages, and should adequately discuss the topic, demonstrate maturating self-awareness, and include at least one peer-reviewed source, in addition to your text. Use the rubric to check for thoroughness. Include frequent citation to resources.

The Ashford Library should be used as your primary resource for this assignment, but other credible sources will also be accepted. Your sources should be cited according to APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..  

The paper 

• Must be five to six double-spaced pages in length, not including the title or references pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must include a title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph which will outline the two parts to be addressed within the paper.
• Must address the topics with critical thought and support all assertions with peer-reviewed sources.
• Must end with a conclusion that synthesizes your findings about attribution theory and bias effect on human behavior.
• Must use at least one peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library, not including your textbook.

Question 32

The qualitative approach to research involves the collection of extensive amounts of narrative and written data in order to gain insight into an event, occurrence, strategy, or phenomenon. Quantitative research involves the collection of numerical measurement data in order to explain, predict, or control the interest area of research.

Under what conditions would a person choose the qualitative approach over the quantitative or vice versa when investigating a forensic behavioral science situation? 

When would a mixed-methods design be the best option?

Through your research provide examples and support for the points you are making.

Post your responses in a minimum of 300 words.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Grading Criteria Maximum Points

Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions   16

Quality of responses to classmates   12

Frequency of responses to classmates   4

Reference to supporting readings and other materials   4

Language and grammar   4 

Diagnostic Essay (100 Points)

You must read the short story attached “Wonder Woman” and answer the question on the very last page of the short story. Follow the directions very carefully and use the sample heading. 

Please remember your format:

· Double spaced typing 

· Arial of Times New Roman font

· 11 font

· Do not use contractions (e.g. can’t, shouldn’t)

· Less than 10% plagiarism

· 2 pages

Work must have a Thesis, THREE body paragraphs, and a Conclusion

Please use only the article to develop your thoughts you can read up on diagnostic essays to understand the concept.

QUESTION:

DO YOU THINK IT WAS FAIR FOR JOHNS HOPKINS TO NOT COMPENSATE THE LACKS’ FAMILY? WHY OR WHY NOT?

Health Care Leadership Journal

Jack Elliott heads a key department at your hospital. Robert Corning heads another key department. Jack and Robert truly despise each other. Robert had an affair with Jack’s wife, resulting in a divorce from Jack, and Robert’s marriage to Jack’s former wife. During the course of the ending marriage, separation with attempts to reconcile, and eventual divorce, Robert and Jack even got into two fistfights—one at the home of Jack and his (then) wife, and one at work.

This history becomes important because you must address a major problem confronting your hospital, and it is essential that the departments headed by Jack and Robert be key parts of the matrix team that you are developing. It is obviously vital that all of the requisite components work well together. Representation on the leadership team is supposed to be at the department head level.

What problems are presented here? 

How do you propose to deal with those problems?

Present a checklist for building your team.

Be sure to address the following:

• Any legal issues
• Institutional policy issues
• Documentation

Describe answer in detail, write in a response to each case scenario. Journal entry should be at least 500 words.

Assignment 1: Principles of Success Plan: Three Goals (Milestone 1)

What are three (3) personal or career goals that you would like to accomplish in the next three to twelve months? Based on the information presented on setting and managing goals in the webtext, identify three personal or career goals you would like to accomplish and explain why these goals are important and how achieving them will help you improve your life. In addition, summarize the research on goals from the “Managing Multiple Goals” Investigation in Chapter 3 and explain how your goals follow the principles of setting good goals.

Milestone 1 should be one to two (1-2) pages in length and should include the following:

1. Specify and explain one personal or career goal you have that can be accomplished in the next three to twelve months. – One paragraph of 3-5 sentences.

    a. Include a succinct, clear statement of the goal or the change you want to make.  

    b. Include a deadline within the next three to twelve months by which you want to have achieved this goal or change. 

    c. Discuss why this goal or change is important to you and how it will help you improve your life. 

2. Specify and explain a second personal or career goal you have that can be accomplished in the next three to twelve months. – One paragraph of 3-5 sentences.

    a. Include a succinct, clear statement of this goal or the change you want to make.  

    b. Include a deadline within the next three to twelve months by which you want to have achieved this goal or change. 

    c. Discuss why this goal or change is important to you and how it will help you improve your life. 

3. Specify and explain a third personal or career goal you have that can be accomplished in the next three to twelve months. – One paragraph of 3-5 sentences.

    a. Include a succinct, clear statement of this goal or the change you want to make.  

    b. Include a deadline within the next three to twelve months by which you want to have achieved this goal or change. 

    c. Discuss why this goal or change is important to you and how it will help you improve your life. 

4. Summarize the research on goals from the “Managing Multiple Goals” Investigation in Chapter 3 that you found most relevant, and explain how your goals follow the principles of setting good goals. – One paragraph of 3-5 sentences

5. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

    a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

    b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length. [Use writing templates in the webtext to make your cover page according to APA style guidelines.]

    c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length. [Use writing templates in the webtext to make your in-text citations and automatically create your reference page according to APA style guidelines.]

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Identify and reflect on how personal responsibility for actions affects outcomes.
• Use critical thinking skills to reflect on personal experiences related to success, failure, and strategies for personal growth.
• Use technology and information resources to support learning issues in success psychology.
• Write clearly and concisely about psychological success using proper writing mechanics.

Leadership Self-Assessment

Explain your personal leadership style through the use of leadership and personality assessments.

Instructions:

Chapter 2 of your text explores how to determine your own leadership style. Using the tools mentioned in the text, conduct a self-assessment of your leadership style and skills. 

The assessments listed in the text are as follows:

• Jungian Assessment
• The VARK test
• The New Enneagram Test
• Dynamic Culture Leadership Alignment Assessment
• Leadership Diagnostics
• Anthony J. Mayo
• Dale Kurow
• Price Group

Must reference at least two of the tools from the text. 

Also include at least three supportive references in the paper, with at least one being an outside peer-reviewed source.

The paper should be 4–5 pages in length, and in APA format.

The book is:

Title: Leadership For Health Professionals Edition: 2nd (2015) 

Author: Ledlow, Coppola 

Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Learning 

Book ISBN: 978-1-284-26669-6