To undertake this, you should undertake the following process: 

1. Select an (online or digital) object or site* of study from a specific area of the the screen industries; 

2. Select a methodological approach** for generating or accessing primary materials; 3. Critically detail and analyse the ways in which the conditions and mode of production have influenced and shaped the resultant product/output that has been produced. 

The object or site of study can be taken from either a contemporary and current media example or you can select an historical example (but you need to en

Step 12: Record and submit the lessons learned video

The summit events have garnered a great deal of media attention. Cyberattacks are creating a rift between the governments and their citizens. Preventing these types of attacks can help establish the lost trust of the people.

You have been asked to deliver a presentation for your CISO and your nation’s president/prime minister. Create a five to 10-minute Lessons Learned Video/Narrated Presentation that would be shown to the CISO and the nation’s leader.

Your audience appreciates honesty and wants to fix problems discovered throughout the process. Define plans that should be implemented to narrow the attack surface of critical systems. What are items, steps, hardware, or types of talent that can be implemented that could lead to alerting and blocking malicious traffic without slowing business operations?

Refer to the CISO Deliverable Overview for a list of requirements for the lessons learned video presentation.

To prepare for this Assignment, review the draft business Problem Statement attached as well as the reference materials provided in the attachments labled “1.3 Problem Statement Rubric, Using Evidence_Synthesis, ProblemStatement_powerpoint, rubric_Business Problem”. Be sure to examine the differences between quantitative and qualitative Problem Statements. Consider the impact of a well-crafted Problem Statement on developing an effective for Study Prospectus. Articles Attached, Annotated Bibliography previously created, research problem literature labeled “Research Problem_lite”, and research problem draft labeled “potential problem statement”. 

Submit the following:

• One quantitative Problem Statement, based on draft Problem Statement below= 1page.

• One qualitative Problem Statement, based on draft Problem Statement below = 1page

• A total of 3-page description and rationale for changes made to both quantitative and qualitative Problem Statements, including supportive references to the pdf 1.3 Problem Statement Rubric. 

Problem Statement/ Topic.

• What strategies are businesses/employer sponsor insurance plans taking to mediate cost and respond to the ever-changing regulatory environment and its cost? ” < preference topic create business problem around this topic is possible. And preferred method will be quantitative 

Essay 2500 words with 2 parts

Taking into account the psychiatric, psychological/psychotherapeutic and social work approaches, what types of mainstream treatment and support options would you suggest putting in place to help meet Mandy’s needs? Answer with reference to the services available within a chosen locality.

Choose an issue in your community or government that you currently see as a problem. Write a research-based argumentative essay in which you take a strong position on how to fix or improve this issue.

At least one graphic should be included in the report (it should be not only included but used and formatted in accordance with APA. Please use sources on Literature Review attached but feel free to include any other you deem relevant.

Central Claim

This is the position your paper takes, which your paper’s job it is to demonstrate the truth of. Examples include: The mind/soul and brain are identical. The mind/soul is more than the brain. Our choices are free, made ultimately by us alone. Our choices are not free, but determined by the material nature of the universe. …

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Argument

This is the logical structure of the inferences you make that lead ultimately to the conclusion in your central claim. This may take the form of a deductive argument or of a larger, Socratic-style dialectic.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Support and Philosophical Consequences

You have two goals here. The first is to lend support to the premises or stages of your argument by clarifying terms, offering examples, and otherwise giving justification to the pieces of your argument that will ultimately lead to your conclusion. Your second goal is to spell out some of what follows if your conclusion is true. This is the “so-what” of your argument. For example, if the mind just is the brain, what does this say about the nature of the person or of free will? If we don’t have free will, what might this say about the nature of morality? et al.

50.0 pts

There are many types of coaching styles. From readings and other experiences such as clinics, classes, and observation of others, you have developed your own personal style of coaching. Write a paper in which you address the following questions:

How do you perceive your coaching style?

How did you come to develop this style?

Did you read about certain coaches and their style?

Did you take it from a coach that you admired?

Did you attempt to incorporate a style taking into consideration you as a person with unique personal qualities?

What do you think is the most effective coaching style taking into consideration today’s athlete?

Additionally, name a few well know coaches that you have admired. Find articles or books that describe their coaching style. Describe how this exercise changed your attitude about the style that you had?

Length: 5-7 pages; minimum of 3 scholarly resources required.

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

PURPOSE:

It is important to understand how borrowed theory can help you in your everyday environment as a nurse. In the previous assignment, you identified a practical problem that emerged from the evidence in the extant literature or professional practice, and you explored how middle-range theory could be applied to solve the problem. In this assignment, you will explore and apply borrowed theory to solve the specific problem that you identified previously, and you will synthesize the applications of the middle-range theory and the borrowed theory into the most appropriate solution to the problem.

DIRECTIONS:

Consider the problem that you described in the previous assignments and the instructor feedback about those assignments.

Write a paper (1,750 to 2,000 words) that describes how borrowed theory can be applied to the identified problem. The paper should include the following:

A brief summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied.

A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem. Is this borrowed theory appropriate to your identified problem?

A brief history of the borrowed theory’s origins.

A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied.

A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem. How would your practice change by incorporating this theory?

A discussion of how application of both the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory can be integrated to create the most appropriate solution to the identified problem.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

The essay should contain at least two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. It should cover the following points:

• Explain the pathophysiology of the disease.

• Discuss common clinical manifestations.

• List differential diagnoses.

• Determine which lab tests would confirm the diagnosis and expected results.

• Analyze a current protocol for treatment and discuss how the treatment works from the pathophysiological perspective.

In Addition

• Differentiate between osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. How does the pathophysiology of the diseases differ? How are they similar? What are the treatments for each disease?

• Explain the relationship between fluid and electrolyte balance and chronic kidney disease.

• Discuss the pathophysiology of osteomyelitis.

• Differentiate between three types of muscle disorders.