Archive for June, 2019

High School Athletics – Transportation – Athletic Director Proposal

Description

The following are the Keys to Successful Project Development
Your project must include: 
• An Introduction—Opening paragraph will include school/community (Park Crossing – Montgomery, AL) demographics and a brief description of your project. 
• Subsequent paragraphs must include the following six items: 
1. Who Stakeholders the project is designed to benefit
2. What Purpose of the project of project
3. When Timeline for development and implementation of the project (Fall 2018-Spring 2019)
4. Where Population and/or location where project was implemented
5. Why Need for the project and any risks identified (costs, change, personnel, etc.)
6. How Implementation process and sequencing of events. 
Components
(Introduction)
Section/tab 3 will include a description of the demographics for your school and community. Be certain to write a brief description of your project. (1-2 pages doubled spaced)
(Text Script)
Section/tab 4 will include the comprehensive description of your project which can vary in length depending on the size and scope of the project. Please keep in mind that your efforts on this project should reflect graduate-level quality work. Use the six guidelines that are identified in the Keys to Successful project development. (Who, what, when, where, why and how). Note: Other athletic administrators should be able to use this information as a resource. Your text script should reflect this objective. 
(Assessment & Evaluation)
Section/tab 5 will include an assessment, analysis, and evaluation of the project. This could include timelines of activities involved in the development and implementation of the project, surveys, cost analysis, photos, other supporting information, and possible outcomes. (1-2 pages doubled spaced)
(Conclusion)
Section/tab 6 will include a summary of the project with your thoughts and observations resulting in a conclusion. You should identify all Leadership Training Courses or other resources that assisted in the development and implementation of the project. (1-2 pages doubled spaced)
Details 
Implementation of Trip Direct for Park Crossing High School for Athletic Teams
Project was implemented over 6 months
This ensured safety
Eliminated paper
All sports would use
System AD, all admin could keep up with teams 
Easier to to track buses
Now process is spreading throughout the system 

This was done but I was unable to write it up not I have to submit this final thing and it has be submitted within a week for a major final certification to get 6 years of funding. This is crucial. Sources can be other schools that used and also details on the program.

Aristotelian Analysis Paper

Description

A very long time ago, the Ancient Greeks realized that being able to persuade others is a key to organized society. Leaders must rally others to their cause, and lawmakers much reach consensus. As one of the first democracies, this was especially paramount in ancient Greece where politicians needed to win over the hearts and minds of their constituents to be elected.
The ancient Greeks realized the vast power of rhetoric in civic life. They recognized that rhetoric had the power to bring people together and the power to drive them apart. They realized that rhetoric could appeal to noble human feelings like empathy and logic, but also to base human feelings like anger and prejudice. In so, some ancient Greeks decried the teachers of rhetoric as immoral magicians who cast spells over their audiences. Other Greek thinkers, however, refrained from moral judgement of the persuasive arts and sought only to better describe how people are persuaded. Aristotle was one of those thinkers. The basic categories that Aristotle used to break down the elements of persuasion still apply today. They are as discussed by modern rhetors as they were in Ancient Greece.
You will write a short (2-3 page double-spaced) Aristotelian rhetorical analysis of a political ad of your choice. Below is a link with good archives (or you may find the ad anywhere on the internet as long as you can provide a link):
http://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/

Introduction: Context of the Ad
Before we break down an ad, we need to know its rhetorical situation. This may be a discussion of what was going on at the time the ad was made, who the target audience is, and anything else that isn’t in the ad itself that might be important to know. Your thesis will likely be at the end of your introduction. Your thesis is your main claim about what rhetorical strategies the ad uses and why. The basic pattern of the thesis will be something like: The (name of your ad) advertisement uses (these rhetorical strategies) to achieve (this desired goal).
For example, with the ad, “Fine?”, my thesis might be: “The political advertisement “Fine?” paints President Obama as callous and out of touch by setting up a sound bite where he says, “the private sector is doing fine” and then using stylized testimonials to disprove the idea with a series of tales of personal woe from average people.”

Body Paragraphs
Because this is an analysis paper, your body paragraphs will focus on the two basic elements of analysis—breaking down, and putting back together. You may cover all three terms (Ethos, Pathos, or Logos) or you can focus on only one or two if that is where the rhetorical strategies of the advertisement are the most apparent. Each body paragraph should prove a point with observations, inferences, and explanation. The length and number of body paragraphs is up to your discretion. Because we have three terms and the standard five paragraph essay has three body paragraphs, some students choose to have a body paragraph for each of the appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), but you do not have to organize your paper in that way.
Conclusion
Summarize the main analysis of the paper. The conclusion is a place where you may also need to do more of the “putting it back together” part of your analysis. Your paper should stay focused on impartial analysis through most of the paper, but in the conclusion there is room for some judgement on the ethical implications of the argument or its overall rhetorical effectiveness.

 

Applying Theory to a Practice Problem:

 

 Part 2: Application of Middle-Range Theory to Problem

 

PURPOSE:

It is important to understand how middle-range theory can help you in your everyday environment as a nurse. In the previous assignment, you identified a practical problem that emerged from the evidence in the extant literature or professional practice. In this assignment, you will explore and apply middle-range theory to solve the specific problem that you identified in the previous assignment.

DIRECTIONS:

Consider the problem that you described in the previous assignment and the instructor feedback about that assignment.

Write a paper (1,000 to 1,500 words) that describes how middle-range theory can be applied to the identified problem. The paper should include the following:

  1. A brief summary of the problem.
  2. A description of a middle-range theory that could be applied to the problem. Is this middle-range theory appropriate to your identified problem?
  3. A brief discussion of the middle-range theory’s origins.
  4. A discussion of how the middle-range theory has been previously applied.
  5. A discussion of the application of the middle-range theory to the identified problem. How would your practice change by incorporating this theory?

Prepare this assignment according to guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

error: Content is protected !!