I previously submitted this to you, please revise as it failed and follow the guide i have attached, parts need rewriting
2. Summative Assessment for Using Information in Human Resources (5UIN/02)
________________________________________
Learning outcomes:
1. Understand the research process and different research approaches.
2. Be able to conduct a critical review of information sources in an area of HR/business practice and analyse the findings.
3. Be able to draw meaningful conclusions and evaluate options for change.
4. Know how to deliver clear, business-focused reports on an HR issue.
Assessment brief/activity
Your CEO has asked each departmental head to undertake a critical review of their systems, processes and practices as part of a major organisational change agenda. You have been asked to review an area of HR/business practice and present a business report to key stakeholders with recommendations for improving practice. To provide the basis for your report, you have been asked to conduct a critical review of information sources relevant to the area of practice. You should:
• Select an area of HR/business practice and give the reason for your choice
• Undertake a critical review of different information sources (at least three) e.g. research digests, academic and professional literature, online databases, key texts relevant to the selected area of practice.
• In your write up of the literature review you should explain why you selected that particular source and highlight some of the different research approaches adopted by the authors and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these different approaches.
• Draw meaningful conclusions from the review of the different information sources.
• Make justified recommendations to named stakeholders for sustaining and/or improving practice.
Your report structure should include:
• Title page (report title and their name, submission date)
• Executive summary (overview, methods of analysis, findings, recommendations)
• Table of contents (list of numbered sections)
• Introduction (terms of reference)
• Main body (headings and sub-headings – these could be for each information source reviewed). Candidates should use a mix of narrative and diagrammatic formats to present their findings.
• Conclusion (including major inferences and recommendations for change)
• Reference list
• Appendix if used i.e. information supporting their analysis but not essential to its explanation.
Evidence to be produced/required
A written business report for stakeholders of approximately 2600 words. The title page, executive summary, reference list and any appendices are excluded from the word count.
You should relate academic concepts, theories and professional practice to the way organisations operate, in a critical and informed way, and with reference to key texts, articles and other publications and by using organisational examples for illustration.
All reference sources should be acknowledged correctly and a bibliography provided where appropriate (these should be excluded from the word count).
All submissions should be in the region of 2,600 words plus or minus 10% and references should be added in the Harvard Referencing Format. There is a Harvard Referencing tutorial in the Resources Area which outlines the formatting required.

This essay will be based on all the other essays i have submitted to you, so i will send each on to you once they have been passed. I have attached all the assignment sheets so you can see what i need to have learned and a powerpoint guide to follow

1. Summative Assessment for Developing Professional Practice (5DVP/01)
________________________________________
Learning outcomes:
1. Understand what is required to be an effective and efficient HR professional.
2. Be able to perform efficiently and effectively as an HR professional.
3. Be able to apply CPD techniques to construct, implement and review a personal development plan.
Assessment brief/activity
You are asked to develop an electronic portfolio of evidence which includes four sections that respond to the following tasks:
Activity 1
Evaluate what it means to be an HR professional, making reference to the current CIPD Profession Map. This can be accessed athttps://www.cipd.co.uk/learn/career/profession-map
Activity 2
Briefly describe the elements of group dynamics and give at least two examples of conflict resolution methods within an HR context.
Activity 3
With reference to a recent or current project (large or small) which you have led (or been part of a project team):
• Provide evidence of using project management and problem-solving techniques in the course of the project.
• Explain how you successfully influenced, persuaded and negotiated with others in the course of the project (or other related activity).
Activity 4
• Undertake a self-assessment of one area of your practice to identify your professional development needs in that area and options to address these.
• Produce a professional development plan (PDP) plan to meet your professional development needs which includes a justification of the option(s) chosen.
• During your programme, provide a reflective summary of your performance against the plan. You should also identify any future development needs and record these in your PDP.
(Note: If required, CPD plan and record templates for students are available at https://www.cipd.co.uk/learn/cpd/about )
Evidence to be produced/required
A portfolio of evidence of approximately 2600 words in total (excluding the PDP) that responds to each of the four tasks.
You should relate academic concepts, theories and professional practice to the way organisations operate, in a critical and informed way, and with reference to key texts, articles and other publications and by using organisational examples for illustration.
All reference sources should be acknowledged correctly and a bibliography provided where appropriate (these should be excluded from the word count).
All submissions should be in the region of 2,600 words plus or minus 10% and references should be added in the Harvard Referencing Format. There is a Harvard Referencing tutorial in the Resources Area which outlines the formatting required

Many factors are considered when termination of parole is determined. When an offender is discharged from prison and reenters the community, he or she remains on federal parole for a specified period of time. During the reentry process, many types of supports are incorporated into the reentry plan along with risk assessments, to measure the level and predictors of the offender reoffending again. The most important step after reentry occurs is determining an appropriate time to release the offender completely from judicial supervision.

Review the policy regarding the termination of federal parole by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Create a 2-slide presentation that responds to the following:

• Provide an introduction to the issue, including an explanation of the role of mentorship (1 slide)
• What are some examples of circumstances where a probation officer might decide to approve a parolee for early release from his or her parole period? (1 slide)

Review Public Relations and Social Media: Deliberate or Creative Strategic Planning. After reading this article and identifying challenges associated with social media, discuss how organizations can use social media to effectively communicate with internal and external target audiences. Reflect on your own professional experience with social media, and consider the following questions in your response:

· How can organizations build trust through social media, both internally and externally?

· How can social media be used to address public relations issues?

· How can social media be used to support the culture, strategic vision, values, and/or mission of the organization?

PhD candidates should provide an authentic personal statement reflecting on their own personal interest. In the event that any outside resources are used, those should be cited in APA format. Submissions should be a maximum of 500 words or 125 words per question/prompt. Applicants must answer each of the four prompts for their program. 

Below Questions should meet the above Criteria.

1. What are your research interests in the area of Information Technology? Why do you think it is important to research in this area?
2. Why did you select to pursue a program at University of the Cumberlands instead of other institutions?
3. As an individual, what are your strengths and weaknesses? How will these impact you as a doctoral information technology student?
4. Where do you see the future of Information Technology heading?
5. How can obtaining a doctorate impact your contribution to the practices of information technology? Where do you see yourself after obtaining a doctorate from UC? 

200 word discussion board

Is social inequality desirable for society? 

Is your perspective more in line with the conservative thesis or radical antithesis perspectives?

 Defend your position on inequality with unbiased historical and/or sociological research-based arguments.

When we approach discussions about diversity, we each come to conclusions with our own perspectives that have been shaped by our experiences. As we begin our first discussion, take a moment to consider what has influenced your ideas of diversity and compare those ideas with what you read in this module’s readings. Then, address the following:

• Introduce your major and profession – NURSING.
• In your own words, define the term diversity and discuss how it is used or impacts your daily life. How does your definition compare and contrast with those that were presented in the readings?
• What is the influence of diversity on your chosen field of study or future profession? How can you use your understanding of diversity in your professional career?

In response to your peers, provide feedback about their definition of diversity. Compare and contrast your answers and consider the following:

• What are the similarities and differences between your peer’s response and yours?
• How do the two definitions of diversity help to illustrate how diversity and society are intertwined? How can a perspective through the four lenses help to provide a greater understanding of diversity?

Make sure you support your response with the readings from this module, and any additional resources if needed.

 Provide detailed answers to  the following questions: 

1. What is one key takeaway on what to do and what not to do when it comes to technological innovation for each case of Google and Lego (four points in all: one “do” and one “don’t do” per company)?  
2. Find an example of a company that failed to innovate and was pushed out of business. What are two critical errors the company’s leadership made?  Could these errors have been avoided?  If so, how? If not, why not?  
3. Find an example of a company that succeeded in innovating and became a market leader. What are two critical things that leadership did right?  Could their success or strategy be replicated in a different industry or market segment? What inspiration could other companies take from this company’s success?