Archive for January 2nd, 2020

Information System Strategic Planning

Signature Assignment Description/Directions: Presentation

Information technology captures, stores, manages, or transmits information related to individuals or the activities of an organization.  Information systems include operational and technical systems, administrative systems for managing clients for organizations to improve their efficiency and effectiveness and financial systems for tracking revenue and managing billing systems. The use of information technology is viewed as essential in today’s industry. For this presentation, the learner will:

  • Select one organization for this assignment then list and discuss 3 or more efficiencies offered by information technology in that selected setting
  • Compare and contrast 2 commercially available information technology systems available to the selected setting
  • Identify and discuss 5 or more implementation considerations that the organization should consider when adopting an information technology system
  • Explore 2 or more emerging trends in information technology that will influence service delivery in the selected sector
  • List and discuss 3 or more considerations and leaderships’ role in driving technology decisions in organizations

This PowerPoint® (Microsoft Office) or Impress® (Open Office) presentation should be a minimum of 20 slides, including a title, introduction, conclusion and reference slide, with detailed speaker notes and recorded audio comments for all content slides. Use at least four scholarly sources and make certain to review the module’s Signature Assignment Rubric before starting your presentation. This presentation is worth 400 points for quality content and presentation.

 

Hebda, T., & Czar, P. (2013) Handbook of Informatics for Nurses and Healthcare Professional (5th ed.).  Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Publishing.  ISBN: 9780132574952

 
 
 

Complete your response to this assignment in an 8- to 10-page Microsoft Word document, using APA style.

Instructions

Literature review

In consultation with your instructor, choose a specific business research topic and complete a full literature review on the topic. The topic for this assignment should be different than your topic in the W3 project.

In your review:

  • Synthesize relevant and relatively current (last 10 years) literature in a focused field or topic. Although the review should focus on recent literature, include any historical development that clarifies the topic. Grading assessment of this item will consider the thoroughness of the reviewed literature for covering your topic. For example, if you are doing a literature review on some area of transformational leadership but do not include works by James MacGregor Burns or Bernard Bass, then you have not appropriately reviewed the literature on the topic.
  • Assess the primary concepts, theories of interests, and methodologies within the literature on this topic. Grading assessment of this item will consider the depth of your review. For example, if you are doing a literature review on transformational leadership but do not note aspects such as inspirational motivation, idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, then you have not adequately reviewed the literature on the topic.
  • Appraise the current state of research (where are we now according to the literature) and the opportunities for new research that would further the field. Your appraisal might propose supported relationships between concepts or factors in the written research that have not yet been tested. Or, your appraisal might defend the existence of apparent gaps or contradictions in the existing research. Grading assessment of this item will consider the clarity of your arguments and strength of your documented support for the proposed relationship or apparent gaps and contradictions. For example, if you propose that no one has clarified whether transformational leadership is inherently ethical, then you need to make that connection (support) from each piece of literature that you review.
  • Propose the next step(s) to address identified problems or opportunities. Building from the currently un-researched relationships or gap you defended in the literature review of your topic, articulate a general framework for how you might address the gap or test the relationships. Include possible benefits to both the academic discipline and professional practice that your proposed research or next steps would provide. Grading assessment of this item will consider the persuasiveness of your proposed framework and benefits.

Submission Details:

  • Complete your response to this assignment in an 8- to 10-page Microsoft Word document, using APA style.

Apply: Signature Assignment: Ethics On The Job

About Your Signature Assignment

Signature/Benchmark Assignments are designed to align with specific program student learning outcome(s) in your program. Program Student Learning Outcomes are broad statements that describe what students should know and be able to do upon completion of their degree. Signature/Benchmark Assignments are graded with a grading guide or an automated rubric that allows the University to collect data that can be aggregated across a location or college/school and used for course/program improvements.

Format your assignment to APA standards.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab as a Microsoft® Word document.

Identify a specific job within a specific company that you might be interested in applying for after you graduate from the University of Phoenix. 

Research the job and the field in general, as well as ethical issues managerial accountants have faced that would pertain to that field. Also, educate yourself on the basics of operations within the job and company you have selected.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper to include the following:

  • Summarize the main duties of the job.
  • Describe a specific ethical issue you might face in that position using 2 credible sources to support your description.
  • Summarize the IMA’s standards of ethical practice and conflict resolution guide. 
  • Analyze how the IMA’s standards of ethical practice and conflict resolution guide applies to the ethical issue.
  • Predict how you would handle the ethical issue.
  • Hypothesize what would happen if no one in the company followed the IMA’s standards of ethical practice.
  • Assess why it is important to follow the IMA’s standards of ethical practice.
  • Design or name any methods of internal controls you think could prevent or detect the unethical behavior in the future.

Nerve Align Reviews

nerve align is a dietary supplement which uses powerful organic ingredients that work toward curbing neuropathy-related pains and other hurting sensations. This is a dietary supplement that has been developed after extensive research has shown it to be effective. You also get additional benefits such as better sleep and improved energy levels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABxYtxUqXb4

Analyze the organization and develop a set of HRM practices that help align HR practices to the firm’s strategy.

Final Project

You work for a HR consulting company and an organization (the same company you have been writing about during this course) “Amazon”  has hired your firm to conduct an HRM analysis and make recommendations to better align HR practices to the key business initiatives of the company. In order to accomplish the goal:

  • Analyze the organization and develop a set of HRM practices that help align HR practices to the firm’s strategy. (Keep in mind the firm’s overall strategy in regards to Porter and Snow and White’s theories)  Develop a 3200-3500 word research paper (not including the title and reference pages).  Your paper should also:
  • Identify the firm’s history, strategy, market position, and specific area of alignment.
  • Provide job pricing and compensation package for 3-4 key positions in the organization.
  • Describe and analyze the current and targeted HR work processes as well as the respective knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required to achieve the organization’s objectives.
  • Incorporate a discussion of relevant technology considerations to achieve work output in the context of the organization’s goals.
  • Provide a discussion of the labor market and the appropriate labor law context.  Identification of companies that are preparing to address any legal or regulatory changes..
  • Prescribe a set of HRM recommendations, specifically tailored for the selected firm. Insert a table with deliverables, accountable people and a timeline for the recommendations.
  • Describe other HRM issues as applicable.

In addition to the requirements above, your paper:

  • Must be double-spaced and 12 point font
  • Must be formatted according to APA style
  • Must include a cover page that includes:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph
  • Must reference at least eight scholarly resources
  • Must include a reference page written in APA format.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

 

Total Possible Score: 25.00

Identify Important Components of the Organization

Total: 5.00

Distinguished – Meticulously and comprehensively identifies the important components of the organization.  Excellent attention to detail.  Important components such as history, strategy, market position, and compensation packages are discussed. 

Proficient – Effectively identifies the important components of the organization.  The discussion provides some important components, but is missing one or more minor details. 

Basic – Adequately describes the important components of the organization.  The discussion lacks examples and detail. 

Below Expectations – Insufficiently describes the important components of the organization.  While some components of the organization are mentioned, the important components are missed. 

Non-Performance – The identification of important components of the organization is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describe and Analyze Current and Targeted Work Processes

Total: 5.00

Distinguished – Provides an insightful description and analysis of current and targeted work processes for the organization.  Relevant and valid statements about the work processes are presented with exceptional examples. 

Proficient – Provides a description and analysis of current and targeted work processes for the organization.  Valid information about the processes is provided, but some ideas are not fully developed. 

Basic – Provides a brief description and analysis of the current targeted work processes for the organization.  Information about the work processes is presented, but the information is irrelevant and/or undeveloped. 

Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a description and analysis of the current and targeted work processes for the organization.  The description and analysis is missing for either the current or targeted work processes.  

Non-Performance – The analysis of current and targeted work processes is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Relevant Technology and the Labor Market

Total: 6.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively discusses the relevant technology, as well as the labor market.  The discussion provides detailed and relevant information. 

Proficient – Sufficiently discusses the relevant technology and labor market.  The discussion is missing some details that are relevant to fully understanding the organization. 

Basic – Briefly discusses the relevant technology and labor market.  The discussion is missing several details that are relevant to fully understanding the organization.  Specific technology examples are limited. 

Below Expectations – Fails to provide an adequate discussion of the relevant technology and labor market.  The discussion may be missing one or both of these required components.  Specific examples are not provided. 

Non-Performance – The discussion of relevant technology and labor market is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

HRM Recommendations

Total: 5.00

Distinguished – Prescribes a thorough and comprehensive set of HRM recommendations for the selected organization.  The recommendations are specifically tailored for the selected organization with exceptional detail. 

Proficient – Prescribes an appropriate set of HRM recommendations for the selected organization.  The recommendations are appropriate for the organization, but are missing one or more minor details. 

Basic – Prescribes a limited set of HRM recommendations for the selected organization.  The recommendations are not tailored to the specific organization. 

Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a set of HRM recommendations, but fails to tailor the information to the selected organization.  The recommendations are not relevant to the organization and are not supported by specific examples. 

Non-Performance – The HRM recommendations are either non-existent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Content Development

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Proficient – Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Basic – Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.

Below Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work, and may distract the reader from its purpose.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper.  Layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting.  There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Word Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.   

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent.

Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions.

Basic – Provides over half of the  sources required in the assignment instructions.

Below Expectations – Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 
 
 

How might a retrenchment strategy and a penetration strategy be linked together?

Assignment:

Exercises

  1. How is strategy formulation related to situational analysis?
  2. How might a retrenchment strategy and a penetration strategy be linked together? What are some other logical combinations of strategies? How may a combination of strategies be related to vision?

Professional Development

  1. Collect examples of mission, vision, and values statements from various health care organizations — be sure to include those that are for-profit, not-for-profit, public and private. The Internet provides a useful tool for obtaining real-time examples to review and evaluate. Utilizing the criteria discussed in the textbook readings, determine the extent to which the actual statements apply the principles discussed. Identify the similarities and differences between “for profit” and “not-for-profit” examples. Compare and contrast statements obtained from public and private health care organizations.
  2. Work through Exhibit 6-4 (p. 212), “Strategic Thinking Map – Hierarchy of Strategic Decisions and Alternatives,” for an organization with which you are familiar. Practice selecting different alternatives under each strategy type.

Exhibit 6–4: Strategic Thinking Map – Hierarchy of Strategic Decisions and Alternatives

Directional Strategies

Adaptive Strategies

Market Entry Strategies

Competitive Strategies

Implementation Strategies

• Mission

• Vision

• Values

• Goals

Expansion of Scope • Diversification • Vertical Integration • Market Development • Product Development • Penetration

Contraction of Scope • Divestiture • Liquidation • Harvesting • Retrenchment

Maintenance of Scope • Enhancement • Status Quo

Purchase • Acquisition • Licensing • Venture Capital Investment

Cooperation • Merger • Alliance • Joint Venture

Development • Internal Development • Internal Venture

Strategic Posture • Defender • Prospector • Analyzer

Positioning Marketwide • Cost Leadership • Differentiation Market Segment • Focus/ Cost Leadership • Focus/ Differentiation

Service Delivery • Pre-service • Point-of-service • After-service

Support • Culture • Structure • Strategic Resources

Unit Action Plans • Objectives • Actions • Timelines • Responsibilities

 

Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2013). Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations (7th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

 

Strategic Human Resource Management

Your research for this week, requires that you assess the competencies that today’s global human resources professional should possess. For this discussion post, list at least two areas that you’d like to improve your own knowledge or skills on and why you think these competencies are important. Then, outline a plan for acquiring this knowledge or competency.

Please include scholarly content with citations supporting your research. Answer the above using the question and answer (Q&A) format.  The Q&A format should include the original question along with your response. Within your post, support your responses with information from at least 3-4 peer-reviewed/scholarly source (not older than 3-5 years) and provide the full citation at the end of your post. Use APA guidelines.

HR Class

In the video Managing Difficult People Effectively (Links to an external site.), it was expressed that managers who focus on themselves rather than trying to change the difficult employee achieve more positive results. Kane offers three actions that managers can use to deal with difficult people.

After watching the video, identify and describe how a manager might apply Kane’s position to managerial communication at the:

  • interpersonal      level in a performance review
  • team      level to promote effectiveness and productivity
  • organizational      level to promote business unit change

apa format and scholarly articles for reference.

Assessing The Abdomen

In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

To Prepare

Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.

  • With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:
    • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
    • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
    • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
    • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Assignment

  1. Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  2. Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  4. What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  5. Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
ZERO PLAGIARISM
4 REFERENCES NOT MORE THAN 5YEAR

Describe and provide rationale for which methodology you plan to use in your DPI project. Be sure to describe how your methodology is in line with your project questions.

For each of the question in the assignments below, I need about 120 words each with individual references. PLEASE, NO PLAGIARIZED WORK

Unit 1

Q:1

Describe and provide rationale for which methodology you plan to use in your DPI project. Be sure to describe how your methodology is in line with your project questions.

Q:2

Describe and provide rationale for which design you plan to use in your DPI project. Be sure to indicate how your design in aligned with the methodology chosen in Unit 1 Q:1.

Unit 2

Q:1

The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines provide some guidance on the evaluation of quality improvement efforts. They are used as both grant proposal and manuscript preparation guides. Use the “Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0” resource to respond to the following:

Discuss how your project/prospectus fits into the SQUIRE guidelines. Explain why your project is a quality improvement project and not a research project.

Q:2

Discuss why quantitative method is the best method based on your project questions and data. Choose three potential designs that you could use for your project. Based on the three potential designs, determine potential analyses methods and why?

Unit 3

Q:1

Describe a survey, instrument, or tool that you plan to use in your project. Describe the tool in terms of name, number of items, how it is answered (Likert scale, yes/no, open answers, etc.), and the total score. Describe the level of measurement for this instrument. Support with references.

DQ 2

Describe the validity and reliability of the instrument you chose in Unit 3 Q:1. How is this different from external and internal validity?

Unit 4

DQ 1

Describe a vulnerable population in terms of research. Why is the population considered vulnerable? What other groups might also be considered vulnerable populations

DQ 2

Review the “Sample Size” Topic Material. Assume you want to do a project that compares the survey results before an intervention to those after an intervention in the same sample (the same people will take both surveys). You plan to use a paired t-test to analyze your results. Identify and select a tool of your choice to conduct the sample size calculation. You may use your SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, but it is not required for this assignment. Perform a sample size calculation to determine how large your sample should be. Justify your sample size calculation with citations. Discuss how your sample size may affect the validity of your project.

Unit 5

Q:1

What are the assumptions for a t-test? How should these be run? Do you want to see a p value of <0.05? Why or why not?

Q:2

Review the types of data that are considered protected health information (PHI). Do you plan to collect any of this data during your project? How would the collection of this data affect your project (whether you plan to collect it or not)?

Unit 6

Q:1

Compare your DPI project manuscript thus far to the “Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0” guidelines. Discuss what you can improve in your DPI project manuscript.

Q:2

Describe the process of a retrospective chart review. How are these data collected? How would you access the data? What is the validity and reliability of these data? What steps would you need to take to ensure these data were accurately pulled from the database?

Unit 7

Q:1

Discuss the basic principles of data interpretation used to translate research outcomes into practice. What are common barriers to translating research outcomes into practice? Describe any barriers you may anticipate as you plan to translate the results of your own prospectus into practice

Q:2

Select a journal in which you would be interested in having your research published. Review the author guidelines on the Journal for Nurse Practitioners (JNP) website and answer the following questions. How could author guidelines be beneficial to your practice?

Unit 8

Q:1

Describe how you can be intentional when incorporating feedback from your content expert and faculty chair when revising your prospectus

Q:2

Your prospectus will require many updates and changes as you progress through the program. Your literature review chapter alone will require 50 or more articles and be more than 30 pages long. Describe a plan to continue the search for articles and add them to your prospectus over the coming months.

error: Content is protected !!