After reviewing this module weeks readings and resources, discuss the concept of globalization. Your initial reply to the discussion prompt will require two paragraphs. In your first paragraph, tell us what globalization means. Provide a few examples of the pros and cons of globalization.

This module weeks readings discuss McDonalds as one example of a globalized company that has changed culture. In your second paragraph, identify your own example of an invention, technology, or business that has changed culture in some way. Discuss how has culture changed because of the example you identified.

  Research one of the health profession licensing agencies in Georgia. In 300 to 400 words address the following:

-Analyze and comment on the role this professional licensing group plays in the creation of policy within the profession as well as the impact those policies potentially have on the economics of health services.

-Specifically, look at the composition of the licensing agencys board of directors. Describe the present composition of the board membership. 

-Evaluate the social-cultural issues that might influence health economics in your state based on the diversity of the board in question. Is the present composition a fair representation of the community the board is supposed to serve? What, if any, consumer representation exists on the board? 

-Compare and contrast economic challenges and incentives among health cares organizational models such as the licensing agency you have selected.

Must use at least two scholarly sources formatted according to APA style.

 Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process.

Please include 400 words in your initial post with two scholarly articles   

criteria week 2: Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important.  Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories. 

The Article Review should be 750-1000 words double-spaced (3-4 pages).  It will be a summary and commentary on both assigned readings for June 6.  There are 4 parts to the Reading Review assignment:

1) Succinctly state the viewpoint each author is promoting (1-2 paragraphs) 

2) Summary of main arguments for each position (1-2 pages).

3) Identification of main areas of agreement and disagreement among all readings (1 page)

4) Tell what you think about these key issues –remember to back this up with arguments! (2 pages)

Define the term Political Crimes (give examples).

What motivates Terrorists to commit violent acts?

Political crimes are crimes committed by the government, for the most part they are committed by government employees or elected officials, the most common are , bribery and treason. the video posted deals with a CIA officer committing treason for money and not for ideology.

***Cholera***

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Reflect on the infections or illnesses you learned about this week. Choose one that you had previously heard of before this class. Compare and contrast the information you knew about this infection or illness before the class to what new, or more specific, information you learned about it.

If you did not know information about a particular aspect, explain why you think that was. Compare and contrast your prior and current knowledge of the following:

• What you knew about the symptoms
• How it is eliminated
• The cellular structure of the pathogen that causes the infection/illness
• How it is classified
• The role of the cellular structure of the pathogen in its function 

It is often helpful to visualize where your work will lead, and you are anxious to get a feel for what your marketing campaign might look like. Imagine that you are about to wrap up your marketing campaign pitch and want to end your data and content information with a flourisha visual that embodies and expresses the entire marketing plan. This flourish or visual would be the last slide of your presentationthe icing on the cake of your marketing campaign. You want to create some sizzle and transform the abstract into something the client can see. Remember, you may not be ready for the final marketing deliverable, but your work here could help crystallize your thoughts as you complete your marketing plan.Keep in mind, the more cleverly you incorporate elements of your current plans and findings into your digital media piece, the more effective your final product will be. Here are a few things to consider as you prepare your visual:

• Branding.
• A call to action.
• Visual interest.
• Ways to convert users.
• Customers, competition, and value proposition.

Examples:

• A Facebook Marketplace listing.
• An Instagram image.
• A YouTube video.
• A GIF for an advertisement.
• A Facebook company homepage mock-up.

Instructions

Create a piece of marketing collateral in the medium of your choice that is appropriate for the customer, the service, and the campaign you are formulating. Include a caption or notes that describe how the work will be depicted. Include:

• Who is the target market or customer?
• Where will this visual be displayed?
• How will the customer get to it or access the marketing collateral?
• Where will this visual lead to if acted upon (i.e. if clicked on or interacted with in some way).
• The ultimate purpose or goal.

Below are the questions that need to be answered, below is the coursework that was given! please use apa format and 2 references
Question: Do you agree with the CIAs argument that revealing the existence of drone strikes is different from disclosing all of the details surrounding their use? Why/Why not?
Question: Do you agree with the courts decision? Why/Why not?
Question: How do you balance the needs of the public for information with the needs of security agencies for secrecy?

You Be the JudgeAmerican Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of Justice
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7308, 2016 WL 1657953 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 2016
FACTS: Alarmed at the reported use of drones to kill human targets, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) submitted a broad request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The request sought information on drone strikes, including selection of targets, number of strikes, and number and identity of civilians killed.

The CIA denied the FOIA request. After years of litigation, it released only one heavily-edited document. The agency argued that FOIA exempted it from disclosure for two reasons. First, the CIA contended that the requested information related to intelligence activity, the integral legal mission of the CIA. Second, FOIA exempts classified information in the interest of national security. The CIA argued that the disclosure of drone strike records would imperil defense and foreign policy.

The ACLU did not agree. It maintained that the requested information was not secret because government officials had discussed drone strikes publicly. In fact, both President Obama and his CIA Director Leon Panetta had talked about the use of drone strikes in the fight against al-Qaeda.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the CIA. The ACLU appealed.

YOU BE THE JUDGE: Does FOIA require the disclosure of CIA records on drone strikes?

ARGUMENT FOR THE ACLU: Your honors, the CIA is improperly withholding information to which the American public is entitled. First, it is hiding behind the FOIA exemption that protects the disclosure of information about its functioning. The CIAs principal mission is foreign intelligence. A targeted-killing program is not an intelligence program; drone strikes are not a primary function of the CIA.

Under the CIAs interpretation of the national security exemption, it could refuse to provide any information about anything it does because everything in some way relates to foreign activities or national security. Is that the blanket license we want to give the CIA? We only request facts and figures, not anything that would reveal an intelligence operation.

Finally, a FOIA exemption can serve no purpose if the protected information is already public. The president and the director of the CIA had already acknowledged that the United States engages in drone strikes. All we respectfully request is the ability to keep the American public informed.

ARGUMENT FOR THE CIA: The law gives the CIA broad power to protect the secrecy and integrity of the intelligence process. Responding to the ACLUs FOIA request would reveal sensitive information about the CIAs capabilities, limitations, priorities, and resources. There is no doubt that this kind of detail would reveal intelligence activities and is properly protected under FOIA exemptions. The law protects this information from disclosure for good reason, as its revelation would unnecessarily compromise the Agencys efforts and endanger Americans. As for President Obamas disclosures, acknowledging that drone strikes exist has very different implications from disclosing all of the details surrounding their use. The latter goes too far in the name of freedom of informationand compromises other freedoms in the process.

You Be the JudgeEthan Miller/Getty Images News/Getty Images
Privacy Act.
This 1974 statute prohibits federal agencies from giving information about an individual to other agencies or organizations without written consent. There are exceptions, but overall this act has reduced the governments exchange of information about us behind our back. For more on privacy law, see Chapter 7 on privacy and internet law.