Make an outline for the attached essayExample Essay OutlineTITLEMIGHT, RIGHT, AND BLOOD IN MACBETHIntroductionThesis: The image of blood changes meaning in the play. It contrasts those who have right on their side with those who exercise might [ruthless power]. [Note that the outline begins with the thesis.]I. It is praiseworthy to shed blood for a rightful cause. [The student argues for violence, given just cause]Wounds become a defender of the rightful king. (might for right)I.ii., discussion of honour. [notice the specific references to scenes in the play]Macbeth promoted, honoured for defending king.II. It is possible to exercise power or might against rightful authority [the plot to kill Duncan]A. Killing the king.1. Bloody business (II.I.48).2. More than bloody deed. (II.IV.21). [here exercising might or power is discussed]B. Fulfillment of prophecy: Macbeth shall be king.1. He is king by misusing might and shedding blood.III. Shedding blood upsets the rightful blood line for the monarchy. [a crucial point: who should be king?]A. Donalbains fountain of blood/Is stopped, its very source is stopped. (II.iii.93-4).B. Donalbain becomes Macbeths bloody cousin (III.i.29).1. relation of the king.2. in line to be murdered: The nearer in blood/The nearer bloody (II.iii.136-7).C. Macbeths blood line will not produce a king by either might or right.1. Witches prophecy.2. Macbeths dream of Banquo (IV.i.123-124).D. Additional blood (Banquos) does not make might right.IV. The result of shedding blood wrongly is bloody guilt and more bloodshed.A. Smear Duncans grooms with bloodfalse guilt.B. Blood on the face of Banquos murdererguilt.C. Bloody hand of night cannot hide guilt (III.ii.48).D. Lady Macbeths sleepwalking.1. Wash blood (guilt) from hand (II.ii.59-60).E. Kill the kingbloody instructions. Kill Banquo (Banquo in bloody distance to Macbeth) (III.i.116).1. guiltBanquo heard prophecy; he suspects Macbeths guilt.2. Banquo is in line to be killed.3. lineageBanquos sons will be kings. Battle resultmore bloodshed.V. The blood cycles continue and blood-right prevails.A. Macbeths sons never wear the crown.B. Blood will have blood. (III.iv.122).1. Might will have guilt.2. Right will have might.3. Guilt will have might.C. Duncan, the rightful king, ultimately has might and right.1. Who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him?(V.i.35-37).a. After right is killed by might, guilt lives.b. Right prevails. Duncan hasright even when dead.D. The initial paradox of fair is foul and foul is fair is ultimately expanded to right is might and might is right.ConclusionThesis restated: Blood imagery is a touchstone for the merits of the actions in Macbeth. In theirproceedings, characters are exercising either might [wrongly] or right [rightly].Final note: the Roman numerals (1 V) indicate the likely paragraphs that the student will eventually write. The letters and numbers that follow illustrate the ideas and proofs that the student will bring into play in supporting his or her arguments.

I need a Research Project Include all of the following elements in my proposal. Due Wednesday, 4/8. Title:Tentative project title. Abstract:[100-200 words] Summarize what your research project will entail. Describe the topic, what you specifically intend to research about it, and what you hope to find. Research Question:What is the main question you will answer in your project? Significance: [1 paragraph] Describe why your research question is significant. Why should the reader care? What does this tell us about anything that matters? Research Plan:[1-2 paragraphs] Describe how you plan to answer your research question and what the final project will consist of. How will you conduct the research? Where will you look for sources? Outline:Provide a possible outline that shows what your final paper might look like. You in no way have to stick to this, but it provides a potential framework for you to follow. Sources:List at least 4 sources you will use in your project, formatted in bibliographic entries. After each entry, explain why the source is useful to your topic. As you see the details below I have my proposal approval already and the TOPIC will be Security Challenges of Cloud Computing and now I need to do a Rough Draft at least 6 pages( By Wednesday April 8, 2015) and then I have to finish a research paper with 12 pages by April 30, 2105. Title Security Challenges of Cloud Computing Abstract Cloud computing is the buzzword today. From individuals to small and medium scale enterprises to even large corporations are beginning to realize the potential of cloud computing. This is because, cloud computing allows for cost-effective computing, makes it possible to skip major IT infrastructure investments and is also a modern way of computing. However, theres also another side to cloud computing apart from all the potential benefits it offers. As the shape of cloud computing is evolving both conceptually and practically, challenges related to contractual arrangements of cloud computing, its service quality, interoperability, security and privacy issues are beginning to crop up. Among all, the issues related to security and privacy are the most significant of all. This is because when an organization makes use of cloud computing services they entrust their sensitive data and critical operations to a third party provider. A security incident can disrupt their business services and data causing significant damages to the organization. These service providers tend to have servers which are both geographically dispersed and in remote locations. As a result of this arrangement, there are various factors which could compromise both the data and cripple the organization of their operations if security is not consistent and robust. These security issues are still often overlooked because the benefits are seemingly far too lucrative. This paper will provide a detailed analysis of cloud computing issues related to security and privacy. Research Question In this research paper, I will try to answer whether or not the modern cloud computing still has the security challenges which are relevant today and if it does then its significance on an organization along with a detailed analysis. Significance IT services are increasingly becoming cloud oriented. A few years ago, rarely people made use of file storage services such as Dropbox and One Drive or made use of many different web based applications, but today they are integrated among lives of individuals as well as day to day operations of organizations. As a result of this trend, many different cloud computing service providers are coming up. Some of them are backed by large and well established corporations but a vast majority is still dominated by newcomers. Its important for people to be aware of the security challenges both inherited in cloud computing as well as those which are augmented by service providers who fail to integrate robust security into their cloud computing platform. Research plan I will be looking into recent major security incidents of the cloud computing industry and present an analysis of it to make the readers of my paper aware of its significance. Along with this, I will also look into the research papers that specifically talk about security challenges of cloud computing and use that to present my own analysis of the issues in cloud computing. Outline Abstract – The abstract of the research paper. Introduction – This will introduce the topic to the readers. Cloud Computing Infrastructure – In this, I will talk about what makes the cloud computing a cloud computing. I will talk about the architecture, the different types of cloud available, service models among other things. Security Challenges – This will be the main part of the research paper, where the major question is anwered. In this, I will present my findings on the security challenges associated with cloud computing. It will include inherent or traditional issues, risks, threats, types of attackers etc This will be the bulk of the paper. Conclusion – I will present my conclusion to the research here. Sources http://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript/Journals/IJCN/volume3/Issue5/IJCN-176.pdf – It will be useful in explaining the architecture of cloud computing http://cloutage.org/ – Its an indepdent news and analysis source that lists all major cloud computing incidents throughout the world. http://www.jisajournal.com/content/pdf/1869-0238-4-5.pdf – Lists down various security issues in cloud computing http://www.cert.uy/wps/wcm/connect/975494804fdf89eaabbdab1805790cc9/Cloud_Computing_Vulnerability_Incidents.pdf?MOD=AJPERES – Presents a statistical analysis of cloud computing issues as well as the most prone providers. ATTENTION HERE BEFORE STARTS THE RESEARCH PAPER. The Research paper will need to follow some requirements as described below: THESIS Strong, specific, provable. EVIDENCE All arguments supported with relevant and specific examples, quotes fully explained. ANALYSIS Insightful points, no questions left hanging (thorough analysis), good balance of analysis to description. STRUCTURE Clearly organized, easy to follow arguments and analysis, strong introduction and conclusion. REQUIREMENTS Fulfills paper prompt, proper length, citations, and formatting. Also additional Sources will be sent to you so can have more Information about this Topic. The Files are attached below with additional sources to finish this paper.

Successful completion of a doctoral dissertation requires significant amounts of independent reading on the research topic. This allows the doctoral learner/researcher to become familiar with the scope of the topic and to identify gaps or tensions within the existing literature on the topic. These gaps and tensions become the source of the dissertation research. In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources in your dissertation field of interest. Those demonstrating the most merit to the best of your understanding of the topic at this time should be added to your RefWorks list for potential inclusion in the literature review section of your dissertation.General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:It is recommended that you engage in this activity throughout the duration of this course.Instructors will be scoring your submission based on the number of unique sources identified in the list submitted.Download the resource Literature Review Resources Tool and use it to complete the assignment.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.Directions:Read at least 10 empirical articles in your general dissertation field.In the “Literature Review Resources” document, provide the following for each source:The APA formatted citation.A brief annotation of the key points of the source.An indication of whether the source has been added to (Y) or excluded from (N) your RefWorks list.

Argumentative EssayThis writing assignment involves writing your Argumentative essay. Once you draft your essay andrevise, you may submit it for feedback. The feedback will help you revise the draft so you can submit itas a final. The final version will be graded.Option #1: Your Position on Pirated MoviesDevelop a thesis statementon the topic of pirated movies (piracy hurts the economy by, society canprevent movie piracy by, etc.) and write an argumentative essay. Strive for at least three strongargumentsin addition to a counterargument and refutation(see counterargument and refutationdetails in the Top Ten Tips section). Using argumentative topic sentencesthat include your opinion foreach section can help ensure the majority of your essay is argumentative. Beginning of a sample topicsentence: The first way movie piracy hurts the economy is. Then be sure to support that claim withresearched data. Conclude each paragraphwith a sentence that summarizes the paragraphs mainideas.Sample Thesis Statement:Ideally, a thesis would include the major assignment objectives for the essay, which in this case wouldbe your claim/opinion, reasons why you have that opinion, and the counter-argument: Movie piracy isunethical because (add argument 1), (add argument 2), and (add argument 3), even though (addcounterargument focus).Note that a thorough thesis statement will include the counterargumentin addition to your ownarguments.See Top Ten Tips section for more thesis statement assistance.Use at least three credible sources(the author should be considered an expert on the topic in which heor she writes; try Google Scholar to search), such as books, articles, and websites, to support your thesis.Include a mix of cited paraphrases, summaries, and quotesin your argumentative research paper. UseMLA format to create proper parenthetical citationsas well as a Works Citedpage at the end of youressay. For additional Works Cited assistance visit http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/08/and use the left navigation menu to locate the typeof reference you need.Option #2: Your Position on Electronic PolicingDevelop a thesis statementon the topic of electronic policing and anti-plagiarism software and write anargumentative essay. Your chosen topic needs to be specific and might address a question like the onesyou see in these examples: Should student writers be subject to having their work checked by anti-plagiarism software?Why or why not? Is anti-plagiarism software an effective deterrent to stealing published work? Why or why not? You may choose another topic regarding electronic policing as well; just be sure that your mainthesis addresses the topic of electronic policing.If the assignment does not address one of the givenoptions, it will not be graded.Strive for at least three strong argumentsin addition to a counterargument and refutation(seecounterargument and refutation details in the Tips section). Using argumentative topic sentencesthat include your opinion for each section can helpensure the majority of your essay isargumentative. For example, First, students shouldbe subject to having their work checked by antiplagiarism software because. Then be sure to support that claim with researched data. Concludeeach paragraphwith a sentence that summarizes the paragraphs main ideas.Sample Thesis Statement:Ideally, a thesis would include the major assignment objectives for the essay, which in this case wouldbe your claim/opinion, reasons why you have that opinion, and the counter-argument: Students workshould be checked by anti-plagiarism software because (add argument 1), (add argument 2), and (addargument 3), even though (add counterargument focus). See Tips section for more thesis statementassistance.Use at least three credible sources(the author should be considered an expert on the topic in which heor she writes; try Google Scholar to search), such as books, articles, and websites, to support your thesis.Include a mix of cited paraphrases, summaries, and quotesin your argumentative research paper. Usethe MLA format to create proper parenthetical citations as well as a Works Citedpage at the end of youressay. For additional Works Cited assistance visit http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/08/and use the left navigation menu to locate the typeof reference you need.More TipsVisit http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/01/for more argumentative thesis statementassistanceand to learn if your thesis is both arguable and narrowed.A counter-argument sectionfor this paper should explain what the opposition believes, and it is theopposite of the opinion you are arguing in your paper. For example, if you are arguing that antiplagiarism software should notbe used in college classes, then the counterargument would be that antiplagiarism software shouldbe used. Then in your refutation, try to prove the counterargument false,insignificant, or unimportant with researched information that is new to the essay (avoid recycling factsfrom a previous argument in the essay).The guidelines for this assignment are as follows:Length: This assignment should be at least 750 wordsHeader: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner ofyour writing assignment with the followinginformation: Your first and last name Course Title (Composition I) Assignment name (Argumentative Essay) Current DateFormat: Three sources, documented using MLA style Double-spaced throughout Title, centered after the heading Standard 12-point font 1 margins on all sides Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txtUnderline your thesis statement in the introductoryparagraph.

Your instructor will assign and send you a peer’s paper from the Health Care Provider and Faith Diversity: First Draft assignment. Your job is to critically read the assignment and make corrections/comments using Track Changes in Microsoft Word. Assess the paper on the following content: Does the paper provide sufficient evidence for its hypothesis or claim?Does the flow of the paper and sentence structure make sense?Should it be organized in a different way? Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Once the document is open, you will see at the top of the page an option to “Review” the document. It is right next to the tab or option that says “view”. Click on the “Review” option. Once it opens it will provde a row of other options. One reads, “Track Changes”. There are several others to the left of Track Changes such as New Comment, Delete, Previous and Next. As you read the document, if you want to make a comment on the paper about something the writer has written, such as a misspelled word, then go to the word in the text, place the cursor to the left of the word andd left click. Then go to the top of the page and click “Track Changes” and then click “New Comment”. A red line will go across the page to the right side of the page. You can insert a comment in the dark red box. I am sure all of you have seen some of those red boxes in this course. (that’s not supposed to be funny but if you want to smile at the comment that would be fine). If you want to make a comment about a phrase or a sentence, then highlight the entire area you are considering and left click and the entire area should go blue. Go to the top of the page and click, “new comment” and the highlighted portion will turn red with that red line shooting across the page, providing you a comment box to make a comment. If you accideentally end up with more than one red box, which is easy to do, then go to the top of the page and click “Delete” The extra box will disappear. If yoiu want to delete the comment after you have written it, then click inside the red box on the right so it will be dark red. Go up to the top of the page and hit delete next to Track Changes and the line and box should disappear. I hope this helps. By the way, once you hit “Track Changes” it will stay operational until you click on it to disable it. If you dont, then anything you type in the paper while it is operational w

Eng1500 Dyer 1 Example (Illustration) Essay It is natural to use examples to prove points. You do it all the time and probably did it last week in your narrative essay. In this essay, the heaviest part of your grade comes from how effectively you usethree examplesto prove a thesis. The criteria for a good example are specificity, relevance,andlogical infallibility. Thethesis statementwill be argumentative. Moreover, it must be specific enough to defend in a very short paper. Good parenting is important is way too general. Using positive reinforcement instead of spanking is better. This paper can be about whatever you like, so long as its very specific and well supported by three examples. Organization is important in this paper. Consider organizing your examples from most general to most specific, chronologically, by type, or in a logical sequence in which the examples build upon one another. This paper must be at least 375 words and cannot exceed 750. Example Paper Synopsis Sonyas thesis is that the death penalty is an inappropriate punishment for serious offences in a moral society. To prove her point, she uses examples of someone who was truly sorry for what hed done, someone who shouted horrible things at his victims family right before being publicly executed, and of a man who was electrocuted and later proven innocent. Sample TopicsA key element of good parentingEducational reformWhy handguns should be illegal in the U.S./Why they shouldnt Eng1500Descriptive Narrative Essay Dyer 2 Grading Rubric(Use these criteria as a checklist) 10 pts A riveting introduction which succeeds in getting the readers attention and leading the reader willingly into your paper 10 to -40 A strategically placed thesis, based on something you firmly believe, intended to make readers agree with you, and around which the entire essay is formed 5 Smooth, natural transitions that guide the reader through the paragraphs of your paper 15 3 Relevant examples 15 Specificity, relevance, and logical validity of three examples in body of paperhow they are argued. 0 to -10 The paper as a whole must be focused. Stay on track. If there are extraneous elements of the paper which do not work to promote your thesis or persuade the reader (however subtly), revise/remove them. 10 A conclusion which drives your point home, makes the reader feel something, or invites the reader to think about the topic of your paper more or in greater depth. The conclusion cannot be a simply restatement your thesis and main points. That is boring, and you are a better writer than that. 0 to -30 1 1/2 to 3 double spaced pages in MLA format (375-750 words) 10 Essay should be organized for optimum impact on reader. Consider using the following: a) general to specific b) chronological c)spatial d) some permutation of the above e) a logical structure intended to optimize your argument f) an organization of your own device, designed to hypnotize the reader through your own virtuosity, which you know is perfect from the very core of your being, despite any prescriptive tried and true programmatic methods of organizations such as the aforementioned. 15 to -25 Correct grammar. Check for apostrophe usage, capitalization of proper nouns, subject verb agreement, verb tense, correct prepositions, comma splices, commas before coordinating conjunctions, correctly used colons and semicolons (if used at all), correctly placed modifiers, and pronoun agreement. 0 to -15 No outside sources necessary. If you do use one or more outside sources, be sure to cite them in MLA format and include a works cited page. 5 to -5 Style. Avoid faulty parallelism. As a general rule, avoid passive voice unless you feel it is absolutely necessary. If even one sentence is slightly confusing to the reader or to you, it is probably too long, awkward, or convoluted. Aim for a lean, athletic style that takes no prisoners. 5 An interesting, appropriate title that gets the readers attention.

Due Date: Jul 12, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points:125Details:This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.Part I: InterviewSelect a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee’s experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.Review The Joint Commission resource which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.Create a survey to assess the subject’s spiritual need during the interview. The spiritual needs assessment survey needs a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee’s responses.Submit the transcript of the interview. The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information from the interview.Part II: AnalysisWrite a 250-500 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:What went well?What would you do differently in the future?Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?Describe the spiritual experience you had with your patient, family member, or friend using this tool. How does this tool allow you to better meet the needs of your patient?Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful

Assessment 2: Reflective report (30%) Overview This assignment continues on from Assignment No. 1 and provides students the opportunity to apply the concepts learned in this and previous coursework to analyse a real-world case study scenario. This scenario will illustrate through example the practical importance and implications of management and strategic planning. This analytical exercise will improve students understanding and ability to think critically about the business and its future direction, so as to better able to understand and analyse real business problems and strategies. Details This assignment focuses on Alibaba.com. More specifically, this assignment includes the analysis of the current and future strategies relating to the Sales and Marketing of Alibaba.com. You are to apply the concepts and frameworks learnt from previous coursework and apply them to the situation Alibaba.com faces. The report will include the following key areas Analysis of Alibabas competitive position; sales and marketing strategies; and recommendations for the future. Formatting requirements 12 point font size; 1.5 spacing, Arial font style. References according to Harvard Referencing Style. Late reports will attract a 20% penalty of the assignment mark for each d ay late. i Note: Further details and materials for this assignment will be made available to the students in the Session 4 class and posted on vUWS. i Note: Number of words: 1,500 words plus References and Appendix. Due: Post your report onto Turnitin by the end of the Week 7 class (Monday 18 May 2015 at 10pm). Learning guide Quarter 2, 2015 2 0 0 8 2 3 1 I N T E G R A T E D B U S I N E S S E X P E R I E N C E 1 Q U A R T E R 2 2 0 1 5 | S E C T I O N F I V E 2 Marking criteria and standards CRITERIA EXPECTATIONS NOT MET MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS Analysis of data and information presented in the report (15 Marks) No relevant data presented Some good but sound data presented, with some relevant analysis. Complete and comprehensive data and information presented with all relevant analysis undertaken. Recommendation s and possible options (10 Marks) Recommendations or options not made or any that are not supported by relevant analysis or information available. Good recommendations and/or options relating to analysis but with some gaps Comprehensive and sound recommendations and/or options based on analysis. Overall report style (e.g. easy to read, good flow of thoughts, interesting and well written) and layout. (5 Marks) Basic report with no reader engagement. There is no obvious logic and is hard to read. Report creates some interest and provides some insights and logic with a basic structure. Report is well laid out and has logical flow of thoughts, is well structured

Details: Empirical research is the foundation to scholarly research and scholarly writing. An empirical article is defined as one that presents original research conducted or personally observed by the author(s). The articles you select will include the following elements: a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study. This assignment will help you locate and identify empirical research studies. Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Locate your completed Comparison Matrix from Module 3. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. All claims should be supported with current research. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Use the information from the completed Comparison Matrix to write a paper of 750-1,000 words that compares the two empirical articles. The paper will include the following sections: Comparison of the introductions. Comparison of the purposes of each study. Comparison of the research questions. Comparison of the literature reviews. Comparison of the sample populations. Comparison of the study limitations. Comparison of the results and conclusions from the studies Comparison of topics suggested for future study. Comparison Matrix Paper 1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory76.00% 3Satisfactory81.00% 4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00% 70.0 %Content 5.0 %Comparison of the Introductions A comparison of the introductions is not present. A comparison of the introductions is present, but is incomplete. A cursory comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. A moderately thorough comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. A thoughtful and insightful comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. 5.0 %Comparison of Purposes No comparison of purposes is presented. A comparison of purposes is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of purposes is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of purposes is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of purposes is presented. 5.0 %Comparison of Research Questions No comparison of research questions is presented. A comparison of research questions is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of research questions is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Literature Reviews No comparison of literature reviews is presented. A comparison of literature reviews is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of literature reviews is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of literature reviews is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of literature reviews is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Sample Populations No comparison of sample populations is presented. A comparison of sample populations is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of sample populations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Study Limitations No comparison of study limitations is presented. A comparison of study limitations is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of study limitations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of study limitations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of study limitations is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of the Results of the Study No comparison of results of the study is presented. A comparison of results of the study is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of results of the study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of results of the study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of results of the study is presented. 5.0 %Comparison of the Topics for Future Study No comparison of topics for future study is presented. A comparison of topics for future study is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of topics for future study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of topics for future study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of topics for future study is presented. 10.0 %Synthesis and Argument No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber. 25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 20.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 5.0 %APA Format Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication. 100 %Total Weightage

Hello Expert Lorraine Armstrong for this task, you are suppose to make some comments in what my peer Radhames, wrote. Based on the assignment that you did for me in order # 43the name of the article is: Film: Paris is Burning You have to read my peer response and the response that you did for me in assignment # 43. And you have to make a comment saying if you agree or not with my peer and why? Try to write a concise and meaningful response of about this size. The substantial amount of text, that I request, should be dense and thorough. When you are going to write a comment to someone’s response, explain why you agree or disagree and how you came to those conclusions.Also Make some paragraphs do not put everything together, and if you are citing you have to do it in AAA Style.