Hello Lorraine Armstrong and transtutors’ management,I need 2 new Learning Demonstrations just like what we did in assignment# TTs110315_142705_7I want the same expert since we worked together for the same course, and most of the files and instructions are already uploaded on assignment# TTs110315_142705_7.”Learning Demonstrations (10 points each): During the semester, each student must submit four (4) demonstrations of learning on a topic reflected in the syllabus. Students may choose the topics on which to focus their learning demonstration, though each learning demonstration must focus on a different topic. Students may choose the form in which the learning will be demonstrated. No more than one (1) learning demonstration may be submitted in a single week.Please read this:I just need one or two pages. But I need 2Learning Demonstrations. It doesn’t need to be professional but it has to be perfect.If you need me to attach to you the course slides to get an idea I can do this!The course is Politicalscience (American and Wyoming Government)”I attached the new materials we covered on class. Please, go back and look at the files on Assignment TTs110315_142705_7 when needed.

The Portfolio Project grade is composed of two primary parts.100 points of the score come directly from your performance on the Simulation, as reported in the assessment submitted in Week 7. This assessment is based on the decisions you made during the simulation and is automatically calculated by the simulation.250 points of the score are based on your participation in the weekly Portfolio Project discussion participation, written analysis of the simulation, best practices gained, and lessons learned.Your assessment should be well structured, like many project management communications. Use the following outline as section headings in your paper to provide structure. Also, make good use of bulleted lists, numbered lists, and tables to further provide structure and clearly communicate information.Introduction (provide background and tell the reader what to expect from the paper)Key Decisions Made (describe a few of the decisions made in the simulation that were critical to the overall success or failure of the project.Lessons Learned (use subheadings and address Successes, Issues, and Actions to consider in the future when faced with similar challenges.)Best Practices (compile a list of three best practices that can be applied to similar projects in the future)Required length is 7 -10 double-spaced pages.Include a minimum of four academic or professional references that provide information and guidance for assertions made in your paper.As always, follow CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. Note: Outside sources means academic and research other than the textbook, course materials, or other information provided as part of the course materials. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find academic sources.

Hello Expert for this task, you are suppose to make some comments in what my peer Justin wrote. Based on the assignment that you did for me in order # 25 .The name of the article is: Kath Weston. Exiles from Kinship. ” You have to read my peer response and the response that you did for me in assignment # 25. And you have to make a comment saying if you agree or not with my peer and why? Try to write a concise and meaningful response of about this size. The substantial amount of text, that I request, should be dense and thorough. When you are going to write a comment to someone’s response, explain why you agree or disagree and how you came to those conclusions.Also Make some paragraphs do not put everything together, and if you are citing you have to do it in AAA Style.

Rate yourself using the results from the “Nurse Manager Skills Inventory”:http://www.aacn.org/wd/practice/docs/nurse-manager-inventory-tool.pdfWrite a reflection of 750-1,000 words in which you identify your strengths and weaknesses related to the four content areas below:Personal and professional accountabilityCareer planningPersonal journey disciplinesReflective practice reference behaviors/tenetsDiscuss how you will use your current leadership skill set to advocate for change in your workplace.Identify one personal goal for your leadership growth and discuss your implementation plan to achieve that goal.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

PLEASE USE AMERICAN AIRLINES AS THE COMPANY FOR THE SWOT AND PAPER. ALL WORK MUST ME ORIGINAL AND ALL WORK CITED IN TEXT. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.For this assessment, submit the following two deliverables:A completed SWOT analysis.A 46-page paper based on your SWOT analysis.DirectionsChoose an airline currently in business to use as the basis for this assessment. Use the Internet and Capella library to research the airline.Using the SWOT Analysis Template (linked in the Resources under the Suggested Resources heading) or a similar format of your choice, complete a SWOT analysis of the airline you selected. Submit this document as part of your assessment.Write a paper that is well organized and contains the following subheadings and content:IntroductionProvide an overview of your chosen airline and its place in the industry. Write a paragraph or two that names the airline, describes it, and briefly provides background information on what business strategies the airline is using and where it fits in the industry.Internal EnvironmentUsing the strengths and weakness information you gathered as part of your SWOT analysis of your selected airline, analyze the airline’s internal environment for the conditions and factors that influence its activities and choices, including its business strategies. Examples of criteria for the strengths and weaknesses parts of the SWOT analysis are provided in the table below.The internal environment includes:Human resources staff, volunteers, board members, target population.Physical resources location, building, equipment; funding for resources grants, funding agencies, other sources of income.Activities and processes programs run, systems employed.Past experiences – building blocks for learning and success; reputation in the community.External EnvironmentAnalyze the selected organization’s external environment for the conditions and factors surrounding it that influence its activities and choices, including its business strategies. Cast a wide net for the external part as you compile your SWOT analysis. Examples of the criteria for the opportunities and threats are provided in the table below.External forces the organization does not control include the following:Future trends in the field or the culture.The economy local, national, or international.Funding sources foundations, donors, legislatures.Demographics changes in the age, race, gender, culture of those served by the organization.The physical environment.Legislation.Local, national, or international events.InterrelationshipsAnalyze the interrelationships among internal business functional areas and external constraints and opportunities.ConclusionThe conclusion should include a summary of the airline’s situation and SWOT analysis and should call out significant points of consideration. These may be items that will help it to be more successful or those that may prove problematic. Describe the key issues that you believe should be addressed to make effective decisions and business plans, and provide your recommendations or suggestions for handling this issues.Internal Environment Criteria ExamplesCriteria ExamplesStrengthsWeaknessesCriteria ExamplesCapabilities Competitive advantages Customers Suppliers Financial strength Physical facilities and equipment Resources, assets, people, employees Experience, knowledge, data Marketing reach, distribution, awarenessInnovative aspects Location and geographical Price, value, quality LicensingGaps in capabilities Lack of competitive strength Reputation, presence, and reach Financials Known vulnerabilities Pressures Cash flow Continuity Morale, commitment, leadership LicensingExternal Environment Criteria ExamplesCriteria ExamplesOpportunitiesThreatsCriteria ExamplesSocial forces, lifestyle trends Consumer desires and values Political impact Legal and governmental issues Economic factors Environmental issues Technology development and innovation Competitors Industry trends Global influences Geographical Business and product developmentPolitical effects Legislative effects Environmental effects Technology development and innovation CompetitorsMarket demand Economic factors Global influencesAdditional RequirementsWritten communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.Number of resources: Use a minimum of four resources.Length of paper: 46 typed, double-spaced pages.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Due Date: Jul 12, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points:125Details:This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.Part I: InterviewSelect a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee’s experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.Review The Joint Commission resource which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.Create a survey to assess the subject’s spiritual need during the interview. The spiritual needs assessment survey needs a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee’s responses.Submit the transcript of the interview. The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information from the interview.Part II: AnalysisWrite a 250-500 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:What went well?What would you do differently in the future?Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?Describe the spiritual experience you had with your patient, family member, or friend using this tool. How does this tool allow you to better meet the needs of your patient?Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful

Assessment 2: Reflective report (30%) Overview This assignment continues on from Assignment No. 1 and provides students the opportunity to apply the concepts learned in this and previous coursework to analyse a real-world case study scenario. This scenario will illustrate through example the practical importance and implications of management and strategic planning. This analytical exercise will improve students understanding and ability to think critically about the business and its future direction, so as to better able to understand and analyse real business problems and strategies. Details This assignment focuses on Alibaba.com. More specifically, this assignment includes the analysis of the current and future strategies relating to the Sales and Marketing of Alibaba.com. You are to apply the concepts and frameworks learnt from previous coursework and apply them to the situation Alibaba.com faces. The report will include the following key areas Analysis of Alibabas competitive position; sales and marketing strategies; and recommendations for the future. Formatting requirements 12 point font size; 1.5 spacing, Arial font style. References according to Harvard Referencing Style. Late reports will attract a 20% penalty of the assignment mark for each d ay late. i Note: Further details and materials for this assignment will be made available to the students in the Session 4 class and posted on vUWS. i Note: Number of words: 1,500 words plus References and Appendix. Due: Post your report onto Turnitin by the end of the Week 7 class (Monday 18 May 2015 at 10pm). Learning guide Quarter 2, 2015 2 0 0 8 2 3 1 I N T E G R A T E D B U S I N E S S E X P E R I E N C E 1 Q U A R T E R 2 2 0 1 5 | S E C T I O N F I V E 2 Marking criteria and standards CRITERIA EXPECTATIONS NOT MET MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS Analysis of data and information presented in the report (15 Marks) No relevant data presented Some good but sound data presented, with some relevant analysis. Complete and comprehensive data and information presented with all relevant analysis undertaken. Recommendation s and possible options (10 Marks) Recommendations or options not made or any that are not supported by relevant analysis or information available. Good recommendations and/or options relating to analysis but with some gaps Comprehensive and sound recommendations and/or options based on analysis. Overall report style (e.g. easy to read, good flow of thoughts, interesting and well written) and layout. (5 Marks) Basic report with no reader engagement. There is no obvious logic and is hard to read. Report creates some interest and provides some insights and logic with a basic structure. Report is well laid out and has logical flow of thoughts, is well structured

Details: Empirical research is the foundation to scholarly research and scholarly writing. An empirical article is defined as one that presents original research conducted or personally observed by the author(s). The articles you select will include the following elements: a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study. This assignment will help you locate and identify empirical research studies. Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Locate your completed Comparison Matrix from Module 3. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. All claims should be supported with current research. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Use the information from the completed Comparison Matrix to write a paper of 750-1,000 words that compares the two empirical articles. The paper will include the following sections: Comparison of the introductions. Comparison of the purposes of each study. Comparison of the research questions. Comparison of the literature reviews. Comparison of the sample populations. Comparison of the study limitations. Comparison of the results and conclusions from the studies Comparison of topics suggested for future study. Comparison Matrix Paper 1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory76.00% 3Satisfactory81.00% 4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00% 70.0 %Content 5.0 %Comparison of the Introductions A comparison of the introductions is not present. A comparison of the introductions is present, but is incomplete. A cursory comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. A moderately thorough comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. A thoughtful and insightful comparison of the purpose and importance of the studies is present. 5.0 %Comparison of Purposes No comparison of purposes is presented. A comparison of purposes is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of purposes is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of purposes is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of purposes is presented. 5.0 %Comparison of Research Questions No comparison of research questions is presented. A comparison of research questions is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of research questions is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Literature Reviews No comparison of literature reviews is presented. A comparison of literature reviews is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of literature reviews is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of literature reviews is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of literature reviews is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Sample Populations No comparison of sample populations is presented. A comparison of sample populations is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of sample populations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of Study Limitations No comparison of study limitations is presented. A comparison of study limitations is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of study limitations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of study limitations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of study limitations is presented. 10.0 %Comparison of the Results of the Study No comparison of results of the study is presented. A comparison of results of the study is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of results of the study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of results of the study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of results of the study is presented. 5.0 %Comparison of the Topics for Future Study No comparison of topics for future study is presented. A comparison of topics for future study is presented. However, the comparison is not valid. A valid though cursory comparison of topics for future study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of topics for future study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of topics for future study is presented. 10.0 %Synthesis and Argument No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber. 25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 20.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 5.0 %APA Format Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication. 100 %Total Weightage

Hello Expert Lorraine Armstrong for this task, you are suppose to make some comments in what my peer Radhames, wrote. Based on the assignment that you did for me in order # 43the name of the article is: Film: Paris is Burning You have to read my peer response and the response that you did for me in assignment # 43. And you have to make a comment saying if you agree or not with my peer and why? Try to write a concise and meaningful response of about this size. The substantial amount of text, that I request, should be dense and thorough. When you are going to write a comment to someone’s response, explain why you agree or disagree and how you came to those conclusions.Also Make some paragraphs do not put everything together, and if you are citing you have to do it in AAA Style.

Eng1500 Dyer 1 Example (Illustration) Essay It is natural to use examples to prove points. You do it all the time and probably did it last week in your narrative essay. In this essay, the heaviest part of your grade comes from how effectively you usethree examplesto prove a thesis. The criteria for a good example are specificity, relevance,andlogical infallibility. Thethesis statementwill be argumentative. Moreover, it must be specific enough to defend in a very short paper. Good parenting is important is way too general. Using positive reinforcement instead of spanking is better. This paper can be about whatever you like, so long as its very specific and well supported by three examples. Organization is important in this paper. Consider organizing your examples from most general to most specific, chronologically, by type, or in a logical sequence in which the examples build upon one another. This paper must be at least 375 words and cannot exceed 750. Example Paper Synopsis Sonyas thesis is that the death penalty is an inappropriate punishment for serious offences in a moral society. To prove her point, she uses examples of someone who was truly sorry for what hed done, someone who shouted horrible things at his victims family right before being publicly executed, and of a man who was electrocuted and later proven innocent. Sample TopicsA key element of good parentingEducational reformWhy handguns should be illegal in the U.S./Why they shouldnt Eng1500Descriptive Narrative Essay Dyer 2 Grading Rubric(Use these criteria as a checklist) 10 pts A riveting introduction which succeeds in getting the readers attention and leading the reader willingly into your paper 10 to -40 A strategically placed thesis, based on something you firmly believe, intended to make readers agree with you, and around which the entire essay is formed 5 Smooth, natural transitions that guide the reader through the paragraphs of your paper 15 3 Relevant examples 15 Specificity, relevance, and logical validity of three examples in body of paperhow they are argued. 0 to -10 The paper as a whole must be focused. Stay on track. If there are extraneous elements of the paper which do not work to promote your thesis or persuade the reader (however subtly), revise/remove them. 10 A conclusion which drives your point home, makes the reader feel something, or invites the reader to think about the topic of your paper more or in greater depth. The conclusion cannot be a simply restatement your thesis and main points. That is boring, and you are a better writer than that. 0 to -30 1 1/2 to 3 double spaced pages in MLA format (375-750 words) 10 Essay should be organized for optimum impact on reader. Consider using the following: a) general to specific b) chronological c)spatial d) some permutation of the above e) a logical structure intended to optimize your argument f) an organization of your own device, designed to hypnotize the reader through your own virtuosity, which you know is perfect from the very core of your being, despite any prescriptive tried and true programmatic methods of organizations such as the aforementioned. 15 to -25 Correct grammar. Check for apostrophe usage, capitalization of proper nouns, subject verb agreement, verb tense, correct prepositions, comma splices, commas before coordinating conjunctions, correctly used colons and semicolons (if used at all), correctly placed modifiers, and pronoun agreement. 0 to -15 No outside sources necessary. If you do use one or more outside sources, be sure to cite them in MLA format and include a works cited page. 5 to -5 Style. Avoid faulty parallelism. As a general rule, avoid passive voice unless you feel it is absolutely necessary. If even one sentence is slightly confusing to the reader or to you, it is probably too long, awkward, or convoluted. Aim for a lean, athletic style that takes no prisoners. 5 An interesting, appropriate title that gets the readers attention.