This discussion focuses on mapping cloud security controls to existing frameworks or regulations.

You will need to create 1 new thread AND post AT LEAST 2 comments on other students’ threads. Here’s how to get started:

Download the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix spreadsheet. (A quick Internet search should give you the address of the most current version for download.) Under the “Scope Applicability” heading, select a category that is applicable to the organization for which you work. For example, if your organization handle personal medical data and uses the COBIT framework, you could choose either COBIT or HIPAA/HITECH. Once you select a category, choose  row from “Control Domain” (that no other student has already selected!) Then, create a new thread in this week’s discussion with the title from column B (i.e. CCM V3.0 Control ID.) Discuss three (3) ways in which the control domain maps to your chosen scope, and specifically what your organization does to implement the stated control. State the type of your industry.

Note: Do not disclose the actual name of your organization, only the type of industry  e.g. Finance, Government e.tc

OUTLINE YOUR DISCUSSION CLEARLY WITH HEADINGS FROM THE QUESTION.

If you don’t know which scope applies to your organization, just use the University of the Cumberlands (UC) as your organization. As a university, we are under the domain of FERPA, So, is you choose UC, you would need to choose a Control Domain and explain how it maps to FERPA, and how UC implements the controls. 

So, here’s an example. Let’s suppose I work for a large on-line retailer. We handle payment cards and are therefore under PCI DSS requirements. I’ll select BCR-03 control ID (Business Continuity Planning.) So I would create a new thread in this week’s discussion with the title “BCR-03.” Then I’d explain what BCR-03 is, what it maps to in PCI DSS (4.1, 4.1.1, 9.1, 9.2), and then I’d explain what my organization does to comply with this control requirement. 

Once you create your new thread, you need to find AT LEAST 2 other threads from other students and comment on their threads. Make sure your comments are more than “I agree”, or “Good post.” Provide SUBSTANTIVE comments

After watching the video and reading the articles please respond to the following questions:

1) From the video, what did you find most surprising and why? List the time point in the video (ex: 4:21 – 5:17) and explain why that aspect was surprising to you.

2) From the first article, do you think the techniques they describe could be useful in your college classes? Why or why not – explain.

3) How do we forget previously learned material? That is, does forgetting happen due to decay of old material or overwriting of old material with new material? Explain

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/5?ui=2&ik=d0acc8b610&attid=0.9&permmsgid=msg-a:r-3937368870311734325&th=16c31b5014196111&view=att&disp=safe&realattid=f_jyl1hlzp8https://mail.google.com/mail/u/5?ui=2&ik=d0acc8b610&attid=0.2&permmsgid=msg-a:r-3937368870311734325&th=16c31b5014196111&view=att&disp=inline&realattid=f_jyl1hlwu0

300 words

ssignment Details

The employment of terrorist tactics and strategies is inextricably linked to a terrorist organization’s objectives and underlying motivation. Additionally, a terrorist organization must execute certain functions to conduct operations. This requires the selection of new recruits to support the terrorists’ cause.

In 5–6 paragraphs, address the following: 

• Describe how terrorist target selection links to the group’s underlying ideological perspective. 
• Briefly explain how the 8 phases of terrorism support the attainment of terrorist goals and objectives.
• Describe the radicalization process and how recruits are targeted and indoctrinated.

VOLKSWAGEN

They have been in the news in recent years over their

controversial, yet ingenious, design of being able to trick emission tests. We will breakdown the

portions of the paper:

Topic:

Cultural Practices of Volkswagen

Theorists such as Jean Piaget and Erik Erikson have documented the psychological skills and psychosocial needs of juveniles as being different from those of adults. Juveniles of different age groups have differing supervision needs. Even children of the same age may have significantly different needs. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the needs of juvenile offenders in forensic treatment settings are unique from those of their adult counterparts.

Restrictions in treatment environments often impact the overall treatment process for juvenile offenders. Juvenile courts may mandate treatment, and parents may refuse to be part of the change process. In addition, drug abuse, sexuality, peer relationships, gangs, and violence can all complicate treatment efforts when treating juvenile offenders. Forensic treatment practitioners must be acutely aware of juvenile (minor’s) rights in their locales as well as the laws surrounding juvenile offender treatment.

To prepare for this Discussion:

• Conduct an Internet search or search the Walden library, and select one peer-reviewed journal article related to effective treatment approaches for juveniles. Think about how effective treatment approaches and programs for juveniles differ from those for treating adult offenders. Consider how the approaches and programs for these two forensic populations are similar.
• Think about the unique characteristics of juvenile offenders, and reflect on considerations related to the treatment of juvenile offenders.
• Select at least two similarities and two differences between juvenile and adult offender treatment approaches and programs.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3

Post a comparison (similarities and differences) between juvenile and adult offender treatment approaches and programs. Explain at least two similarities and two differences related to treatment approaches and treatment programs. Explain at least one conclusion you drew or insight you gained as a result of your comparison.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

Leona Helmsley, Martha Stewart, Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, Susan Smith, and Andrea Yates are some of the famous, or infamous, females who have recently spent time in correctional forensic treatment settings. These women were media “favorites,” and while their crimes were certainly worthy of attention, what is more telling and compelling is that these women exhibited many common features shared by female offenders. When considering what these and other female offenders have in common, it is obvious that such features have implications for treatment approaches, the treatment itself, and the measurement of treatment success.

To prepare for this Assignment:

• Consider the features common to female offenders, and think about how these features affect treatment approaches and their treatment outcomes.
• Select at least two of the features common to female offenders to use for this Assignment.
• Think about the implications of these specific features when selecting treatment approaches and treatment outcomes that might be appropriate and effective for female offenders. Consider how these features would affect treatment itself.

The Assignment (1–2 pages):

• Identify and briefly describe the two features common to female offenders that you selected for this Assignment.
• Explain how and why each of these features is common among female offenders.
• Explain the implications of each feature on treatment approaches and treatment outcomes for female offenders. Be specific, and provide examples.