Description: 

The model dataset is a list of movie / series titles from Netlix (netflix_titles.csv), which is stored in the same folder as this file. 

Dataset loading and editing in Power Query Load the netflix titles.csv file into Power BI. In Power Query, check that the data types are correct, or edit the column names if you want to follow a different naming convention. 

Filter records where type = blank or type = “William Wyler”. Upload to Power BI Desktop. Visualization Upload the Netflix logo, visually tune the report to its colors (see manual). 

Add a report title and slicer to switch between title / series type / movie. Add a card visual with the total number of titles. Add a line chart according to the number of titles added over time. Top 5 countries by number of titles – choose the appropriate visualization. Top 5 genres by number of titles – choose the appropriate visualization. Table with titles and descriptions of titles – will serve as detailed information when filtering between visuals. At least 1 visualization at your own discretion 🙂 

Data questions

 In which year did the most series be added and how many? On what day did the most movies be added and how many? How many titles did the Czech Republic participate in? On how many series and how many movies? Which country combination has the most titles? Bonus Which film is the shortest and which is the longest? What is the maximum number of actors assigned to a title? 

Form of submission: The final file with the report. 

In your final assignment you are tasked with demonstrating theoretical synthesis and critical reflection. You will be evaluated by your ability to define key concepts, support your arguments, and apply class and textual material. The expectation here is a well-reasoned series of answers with a high level of critical thinking, originality of thought, and mastery of the subject matter. The writing should be structured and is expected to have no discernible grammatical or phrasing issues.

Using at least three sources (primarily long form, investigative newspaper or magazine articles). I would like you to analyze the political-economic situation in Bolivia over the last three or so years.

Consider the spectrum of actors involved. The regional context and the importance of external forces: from the Organisation of American States (OAS) to the United States. Theoretically, what is the iron law of oligarchy? How does it relate to Bolivia’s Movement Towards Socialism?

You are encouraged to provide context with any information you deem necessary. And, perhaps most importantly, apply themes from our textbook including structural, rational choice, or cultural theory.

In your final assignment you are tasked with demonstrating theoretical synthesis and critical reflection. You will be evaluated by your ability to define key concepts, support your arguments, and apply class and textual material. The expectation here is a well-reasoned series of answers with a high level of critical thinking, originality of thought, and mastery of the subject matter. The writing should be structured and is expected to have no discernible grammatical or phrasing issues.

Using at least three sources (primarily long form, investigative newspaper or magazine articles). I would like you to analyze the political-economic situation in Bolivia over the last three or so years.

Consider the spectrum of actors involved. The regional context and the importance of external forces: from the Organisation of American States (OAS) to the United States. Theoretically, what is the iron law of oligarchy? How does it relate to Bolivia’s Movement Towards Socialism?

You are encouraged to provide context with any information you deem necessary. And, perhaps most importantly, apply themes from our textbook including structural, rational choice, or cultural theory.

In your final assignment you are tasked with demonstrating theoretical synthesis and critical reflection. You will be evaluated by your ability to define key concepts, support your arguments, and apply class and textual material. The expectation here is a well-reasoned series of answers with a high level of critical thinking, originality of thought, and mastery of the subject matter. The writing should be structured and is expected to have no discernible grammatical or phrasing issues.

Using at least three sources (primarily long form, investigative newspaper or magazine articles). I would like you to analyze the political-economic situation in Bolivia over the last three or so years.

Consider the spectrum of actors involved. The regional context and the importance of external forces: from the Organisation of American States (OAS) to the United States. Theoretically, what is the iron law of oligarchy? How does it relate to Bolivia’s Movement Towards Socialism?

You are encouraged to provide context with any information you deem necessary. And, perhaps most importantly, apply themes from our textbook including structural, rational choice, or cultural theory.

Rubric reflective journal

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric

Collapse All Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All

New Practice Approaches

0 points

Criteria Description

New Practice Approaches

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are not present.

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

0 points

Criteria Description

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.

Population Health Concerns

0 points

Criteria Description

Population Health Concerns

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is not present.

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

0 points

Criteria Description

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.

Health Policy

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Policy

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is not present.

Leadership and Economic Models

0 points

Criteria Description

Leadership and Economic Models

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is not present.

Health Disparities

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Disparities

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is not present.

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

0 points

Criteria Description

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

0 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

0 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

A:

Review the document. 

 

Assume upper management of the organization is interested in understanding the impact its branding and competitive strategies have on consumer choice, as well as the impact of the bargaining power of consumers in the health care market, especially on your products and services. 

 

Prepare a 1,050-word summary of branding and competitive strategies’ impact on consumer choice and bargaining power on ECRHS. 

 

Part I: Branding Strategy Impact 

Analyze the impact that the current ECRHS brand has on consumer choice of its products and services. In your analysis, consider the following: 

· What is the current branding strategy of ECRHS? 

· How are the organization and its brand(s) perceived in the market? 

· Are there any negative impacts of legal cases against the organization within the community or its consumers? How might this impact their choice of a health care provider? 

· How have your acquisitions of other health care facilities impacted your brand image and hence consumer choice of your organization? 

· How has your handling of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted your brand image? 

· What impact do your branding strategies have on consumer choice and bargaining power? 

 

Part II: Competitive Strategies Impact 

Analyze the impact that the current ECRHS competitors have on consumer choice of its products and services. In your analysis, consider the following: 

· Who are the 3 largest competitors, and how do their offerings differ from those of ECRHS? 

· What share of the market do the competitors hold? 

· What are the threats of new entrants to the market and the organization? 

· What is the threat of competitive/substitute products/services to the organization? 

· What is the bargaining power of customers in the market? 

· How does this bargaining power impact consumer choice in the market and for ECRHS? 

 

Cite at least 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency sites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality). 

Format your citations per APA guidelines.

 

B: Due 4/17/2022 Today

Drug companies are pursuing collaborative efforts with other companies to manage in the world of pharmacogenomics and individualized medicine.

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

· What are some examples of these collaborative efforts by pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Accelerated Medical Partnership (AMP) program)? 

· What are some examples of the value in partnerships and collaborations in health care service systems? 

C:

Respond to classmates

R1

One example of collaborative efforts by pharmaceutical companies is Pfizer/BioNTech for the treatment of the Corona Virus. BioNTech led the R & D and Pfizer, clinical trials.

By partnering, they were able to effectively and efficiently roll out a very new treatment option in record time with significant positive results. Pfizer has additionally partnered with IBM to explore new drug targets for research and data analysis. This type of partnership is a way that pharmaceutical companies can eliminate wasting money and time on treatments that are essentially not viable.

I work for a healthcare system and some examples of partnership and collaboration are understanding the value of each unit's service lines and not competing against each other. Additionally, the care provided to the consumer is generally better once the competition is eliminated as this allows practitioners to send their patients to the hospital that is the best fit for the disease that is being treated.

Collaborations and partnerships with the community and local first responders are integral to a healthcare system's overall success especially when there are competitors nearby.

R2

Due to the fact that I have never considered what collaborative efforts are made by pharmaceutical companies, I had to dig a little to understand. However, When I was younger I remember hearing about these companies that would pay people to run trials on medication or vaccines that they would take for a certain amount of time. The purpose would be to see how it made the, react, or hope that the medication would work at all. Depending on what would happen after the trial, if the trial was successful, these pharmaceutical companies would then produce the doses needed by the thousands to meet supply and demand. I am more than sure this had to be done for the vaccines that were produced for covid-19.

As far as partnerships and collaborations in healthcare service systems, the relationship between ambulances and hospitals comes to mind. Until a few years ago, I never realized that Ambulatory vehicles were basically privately owned. however, they work very closely with the hospitals and most of the time have contracts to work with certain privately owned hospitals. Their job is to respond to the person who has an emergency and get them to the nearest healthcare facility immediately. These are two different companies that are working together to save a patient's life. I imagine having an emergency and there is no way to get you where you need to go, Because of these collaborative efforts in both situations, lives are saved and prolonged every single day. One hand truly does wash the other in this industry.

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

This is week 7.