Select one nursing theory and one counseling theory to best guide your practice in psychotherapy.
Note: For guidance on nursing and counseling theories, refer to this week’s Learning Resources.

Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

For the assignment write on  Nursing Theory (Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal Theory) and the  Counselling Theory (Humanistic Approach)

Write a paper (1,250-1,750 words) describing the approach to care of cancer. In addition, include the following in your paper:

Describe the diagnosis and staging of cancer.
Describe at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required
Explanation of the Diagnosis and Staging of Cancers is Provided.

An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is not provided.

An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided but is missing relevant information.

An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that meets the assignment criteria.

An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner.

An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

20.0 %At Least Three Complications of Cancer are Identified With Comprehensive Discussion of Available Treatments.

Less than three complications of cancer are identified.

At least three complications of cancer are identified but lacking a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

At least three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

30.0 %Provides Recommendations to Address Physiological and Psychological Side Effects of Care.

Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are lacking.

Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are missing relevant information.

Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care meet the assignment criteria.

Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner.

Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Chapter 9: Exercises 3 & 9

Complete 

Exercises 3 and 9 in Chapter 9.

Chapter 10: Exercises 3 & 16

Complete Exercises 3 and 16 in Chapter 10.

Click here to access the exercise files for Chapters 9 & 10.

http://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/business/itc/itc4210/14j/studentfiles/UnitVI_studentfiles.zip

This project allows you to create

a new graphical user interface and apply what you learned in this unit to your application 

project. Be sure to include the following in your interface:

1. Radio buttons that limit the user to only one choice (nested selection structure)

2. A group box for your radio buttons

3. Controls to prevent unwanted characters in text boxes

4. At least one message box

5. At least one select case statement

30-400 due on Friday 6pm

Please assume the perspective of Public Health Director at Local Health Department

· Discuss the relationships between the Gulf oil spill and the public health performance management system (Figure 7.6 in Turnock).

· Identify major obstacles, barriers, or challenges to mitigating public health risk from the perspective assigned to your team.

· Generating a consensus statement by the end of the unit in which your team:

· Negotiates the social, ethical, political, cultural, legal, and/or distributional factors related to the Gulf oil spill by providing recommendations that could better resolve similar challenges in the future. With your team, be sure to identify forms of cooperation, negotiation and/or compromise that would be necessary from your assigned perspective.

Case Study 8 in “Public Health: What It Is and How It Works” by Turnock

Term Paper/Term Paper Instructions.doc

Instructions for Term Paper

Assignment

Friedmann (2000) has produced three subjective criteria of a 'good city.' He has also stated that others can come up with their own different criteria. Think of three qualities that make a city 'good' in your opinion. Explain why they are important. You can use Friedmann's text as a guide to presenting your opinion with arguments. Next, select any Saudi city that you are familiar with and assess its 'goodness' according to the criteria that you have formulated.

Format

MS Word document (no pdf please). 16 pages of text in 12 pt. Times New Roman font and 1.5 space on A4 size paper. Graphics can take extra page(s).

Divide the essay into sections, including an introduction in the beginning, and conclusion and references at the end. Section headers will have the same font and font size as the body but will be in bold typeface.

Follow APA standard style for citations and references.

Be careful about plagiarism. It must be 0 similar in Turn It In report.

Reference

Friedmann, J. (2000) "The Good City: In Defence of Utopian Thinking" International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2):460-472.

Learning Outcomes: 
 On successful completion of this module students will be able to: 
1.   Describe the transformation process by which organizations produce & deliver goods & services. 
 2.   Critically discuss the differences between service operations and manufacturing operations. 
 3.   Collaborate with healthcare professionals to select a patient/healthcare process to improve 
 4.   Apply core operations management concepts to design more effective utilization of resources. 
 5.   Apply the characteristics, roles and techniques of project management to their module project. 
 6.   Reflect on their role in contributing to the project 
Assignment 
Part I: Project Management demonstrated by mapping and improving a healthcare process  [3,200 words, 80% of total grade; assesses learning outcomes 1, 3, 4 & 5 ]  
 (Learning Outcomes: 1, 3, 4 & 5 are assessed in Part I). 
Applying the Science of Improvement, diagnose and critically analyse how you would resolve an issue within a work related process.  
1. Using the principles of operations management map your process to represent the current situation. Identify all problem areas with the process.  
2. Using Quality Improvement Tools identify and critically analyse one problem area in the process. Provide data to support your analysis of the problem.  
3. Based on your analysis of the current state, suggest possible improvements.  
4. Describe and support the realistic approaches you would undertake to achieve the improvement.  
5. Apply the characteristics and techniques of project management to the management of your assignment

Use this 5 questions As subheadings 

 Part II: Reflection [800 words, 20% of total grade; assesses learning outcomes 6] 
 
Drawing on your learning from the module, critically reflect on your experience of completing this assignment. 
You may use a reflective model or framework to guide your reflection, however it is not compulsory. 
Applying the Science of Improvement, diagnose and critically analyse how you would resolve an issue within a work related process.  

Explanation 
1. Using the principles of operations management map your process to represent the current situation. Identify all problem areas with the process.  
I want my assignment to be about the Discharge pharmacy in the hospital .. I attach the operation map you can put it in the assignment  .. describe the current process and  identify all problems in the workflow  like : delay the medication, timing, patient satisfy ……. Ect 

2 ) Using Quality Improvement Tools identify and critically analyse one problem area in the process. Provide data to support your analysis of the problem.  
You can use any Tools :   kaizen 5S , aspd , lean approach, 5whys      .. use Only One problem area critical analyse support by models and theories I choose the delay Time to deliver or patient receive the medication  
“ don’t forget to support it with accurate numbers” use it with flow chart 
Example :

3. Based on your analysis of the current state, suggest possible improvements.  
The suggestion you will find it in the “ Lean sigma to optimize workflow efficiencies in the outpatient pharmacy”  I use  kaizen 5S lean methodology  

4. Describe and support the realistic approaches you would undertake to achieve the improvement.  
Describe How we can apply 

5. Apply the characteristics and techniques of project management to the management of your assignment
 Use GANTT CHART just draw the chart with thw task and elemets and I will put the names and dates 

Part II: Reflection 800 words 

Use gibbs reflective cycle
 

–     introduction should describe what you are going to talk about 
–    The conclusion should describe what you have done! 
–     If you are asked to critique then you should explore both the positive and negative aspects of the article – not just repeat what the article says
–    Reference every idea you get from another source ‘not more than 7 years’
 

For this discussion forum, describe three things you learned from the course that you will want to remember 5 years from now. These can be ideas, theories, concepts, techniques, etc. that you think are memorable and will be useful to you in the future. In addition to naming and describing them, be sure to say why you believe they will prove useful.

This week’s resources focused upon the topic of homegrown terrorism and the radicalization process associated with it.  Concerning this overall issue, can you explain what psychological and behavioral factors might play a role in those U.S. citizens or legal U.S. residents who carry out such extremist violence? Also, how would you summarize the similarities and differences concerning the models covered by King and Taylor and do you feel they coincide with the factors you provided?———————————————————– Please use these resources—————Reading:
Hinkkainen, Kaisa. 2013. Homegrown Terrorism: The Known Unknown. Peace Economics, Peace Science, & Public Policy 19, no. 2: 157-179. 
King, Michael, and Donald M. Taylor. 2011. The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism & Political Violence 23, no. 4: 602-618. 
Olsson, Peter A. 2013. Homegrown Terrorists, Rebels in Search of a Cause. Middle East Quarterly 20, no. 3: 3-10.

Article Review Instructions

You should start your Review by indicating the TITLE, AUTHOR, and # of the article you have read. Please put all this information on a title page or on the top of the first page.
The article that you pick to review must be between 8 to 10 pages and it should be an academic journal in the area of marketing. 

The Article Review should consist of FOUR (4) parts:
HIGHLIGHTING THE CENTRAL ISSUE/DISCUSSION OF THE ARTICLE
What is the issue being discussed? How this issue is relevant to the current market trend?
SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE
I suggest you write this immediately after reading your article…when it is freshest in your mind. Summaries are difficult for most of us to do…so think of it as your "impression" of what it is about. This is not the place for detail after detail…that's not a summary. A summary contains a balanced presentation of relevant ideas about the article so that…another person is able to tell what it is about. The suggested length is 1/2 to 1 page…much over a page and you are really beyond summarizing. 
ASSESSMENT OF THE ARTICLE
This is the core of the Review. I want you to assess the article critically…which doesn't necessarily mean negatively. "Critically" here means going beyond surface reactions, delving into the why's and wherefore's of the author's thoughts and writing. For instance, what did you think of the article…what about the main theses/purposes of the author? How well did the author(s) state and support their position? What do they use to do so? What else do you feel needs to be said or examined besides the points the author(s) made? Are there identifiable paradigms and/or theoretical perspectives being used? How "radical" is the analysis? What can you critically presuppose from what is said? What level(s) of reality is the author focused on? Does the author engage in empathetic analysis? Are the "motifs of sociological consciousness" being used…and how could they be used by you to critique the article? In other words, utilize the"Sociological Concepts" to write an assessment. Don't just give a superficial treatment of plusses or minuses…go into depth. 

"MEANINGFUL" QUOTES/STATEMENTS
As you read the article keep track of statements you find particularly interesting or meaningful…to you. Select FOUR (4) of them and analyze/react to them. 

NOTE
You may handwrite or type this Review…although I certainly prefer typing. The maximum length of the Review is…FIVE (5) pages…no more! (Of course, this FIVE does not include title pages or any blank sheets and your references…just the written part!!) Part of writing is to learn to say what you have to say in concise and precise language.
Also, you may be as creative as you want in writing this Review. You can simply follow the 4-part format indicated above…no muss/no fuss. However, you can mix it up a bit…creatively speaking…but just make sure the 4 parts are there. Be especially careful not to mix the Reason for Choosing and the Summary with the Assessment, though.. 

ARTICLE REVIEW EVALUATION FORM
1.    Introduction – reason for choosing the article  (10 points)

2.    Summary of the article (10 points)

3.    Assessment of the article – Argument and Evidence (10 points)

4.    Meaningful Quote/Statement (10 points)

5.    References (5 points)

Total SCORE: 
Total score for ONE article review is 45 points. However, 10 points will be subtracted for each week the paper is late.
Each article review will be sent for similarity indexes checking. If more than 25% score, possibility of plagiarism is existed. Therefore, you will score ZERO.

The Score for each section (1 – 4) is based on the following rubrics:
1 = absent or poor in content and presentation
–    Incomplete or inappropriate response to the writing task
–    Text lacks proper organizational components (section are either missing or in the wrong order; information meant for one section is in another)
–    Usage and syntactical error so severe that meaning is obscured
–    An accumulation of errors in grammar, diction, and sentence structure
2 = basic content included
–    Evidence is not relevant
–    An accumulation of errors in grammar and sentence structure
–    Little or inappropriate  details to support ideas
–    Content inappropriate to headings
–    The point of discussion section does not match the title
–    List-like and formulaic writing rather than narrative style

3= Satisfactory content
–    Address relevancy issue
–    Not interesting but adequate content
–    Appropriate headings and organization
–    Content appropriate to headings
–    Formulaic organization which does not necessarily advance the argument being made
4= Good presentation in content and quality
–    Evidence is interesting and relevant
–    Effective response in the writing task
–    Development with appropriate support and integration of sources
–    Critical thinking is clearly demonstrate
5= Excellence content and quality
–    Evidence is interesting and contribute valuable knowledge to the field
–    Synthesis of ideas using a variety of sources
–    Full development with appropriate support from the sources
–    Consistent attention to the needs of the reader
–    Clear and correct organization of materials in appropriate sections
–    Strong discussion and conclusion