Assignment 2: Proposal for Organizational Learning Issues
Due Week 8 and worth 300 points

Using the information from Assignment 1 and the supporting documents, you must create a proposal for your CEO explaining the issue and implementation recommendations in transitioning the individual learning to organizational learning. Refer to the Project Proposal template, located in Week 8 of the online course shell for additional information on the content of each section of the proposal.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page proposal in which you:
Section 1: Project Summary

1. Summarize your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

Section 2: Project Background

1. Determine the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.
2. Critique the current OLM(s)’ hindrance to organizational learning and provide your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

Section 3: Project Goals and Methodology

1. Defend the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then suggest three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, diagnose the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then support your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.
2. Suggest two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

Section 4: Project Risk Management

1. Elaborate on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Outline a plan for managing each resistance risk.
2. Generate a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.
3. Specify one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Next, examine whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.
4. Use at least five (5) quality academic references in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource.
5. Use the Project Proposal template located here.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Examine the processes of how organizations learn and organizational barriers that impact the process.
• Examine the concepts of personal mastery and mental models and their related importance in a learning organization.
• Examine the driving forces related to organizational learning.
• Analyze the key components of a learning organization and the role of a chief learning officer.
• Evaluate strategies for creating a learning organization.
• Evaluate management behaviors that influence organizational learning.
• Analyze the shifts in organizational structure and processes to create a learning organization.
• Examine talent management as an essential element of the learning organization.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in developing a learning organization.
• Write clearly and concisely about developing a learning organization using proper writing mechanic.

Click here to view the grading rubric. 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 300

Assignment 2: Proposal for Organizational Learning Issues

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Summarize your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

Partially summarized your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

Satisfactorily summarized your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

Thoroughly summarized your findings along with the implementation recommendations.

2. Determine the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.

Partially determined the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.

Satisfactorily determined the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.

Thoroughly determined the issue that has disconnected the culture and organizational learning based on the three (3) selected mystifications from Assignment 1.

3. Critique the current OLMs hindrance to organizational learning and provide your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the current OLMs hindrance to organizational learning and did not submit or incompletely provided your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

Partially critiqued the current OLMs hindrance to organizational learning and partially provided your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

Satisfactorily critiqued the current OLMs hindrance to organizational learning and satisfactorily provided your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

Thoroughly critiqued the current OLMs hindrance to organizational learning and thoroughly provided your recommendation(s) for the organization to address the issue.

4. Defend the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then suggest three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, diagnose the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then support your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely defended the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, did not submit or incompletely diagnosed the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then did not submit or incompletely supported your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.

Partially defended the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then partially suggested three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, partially diagnosed the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then partially supported your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.

Satisfactorily defended the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then satisfactorily suggested three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, satisfactorily diagnosed the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then satisfactorily supported your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.

Thoroughly defended the one (1) OLM that is suitable (i.e., the OLM identified in Assignment 1) for the organization’s training and / or learning circumstances then thoroughly suggested three (3) pros and three (3) cons of implementing the selected OLM. Next, thoroughly diagnosed the possible source that has prevented productive learning within the organization then thoroughly supported your recommendation(s) for a permanent change.

5. Suggest two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

Partially suggested two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

Satisfactorily suggested two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

Thoroughly suggested two (2) talent management strategies designed to prepare the organization for its readiness to share knowledge and maintain a learning environment.

6. Elaborate on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Outline a plan for managing each resistance risk.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely elaborated on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for managing each resistance risk.

Partially elaborated on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Partially outlined a plan for managing each resistance risk.

Satisfactorily elaborated on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Satisfactorily outlined a plan for managing each resistance risk.

Thoroughly elaborated on two (2) high resistance risks to this transition. Thoroughly outlined a plan for managing each resistance risk.

7. Generate a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely generated a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.

Partially generated a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.

Satisfactorily generated a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.

Thoroughly generated a high quality After-Action Review (AAR) to monitor the effectiveness of the transition from individual to organization learning.

8. Specify one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Next, examine whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely specified one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Did not submit or incompletely examined whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.

Partially specified one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Partially examined whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.

Satisfactorily specified one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Satisfactorily examined whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.

Thoroughly specified one (1) training technique for the organization to introduce this new way of learning to the workforce. Thoroughly examined whether or not the current organizational structure and processes can support transition from individual learning to organizational learning.

9. 5 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

10. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

11. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and  reference

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are free or error-free and consistently formatted in APA style.

12. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

13. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically supports ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically supports ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!

The project will require you to write up how you would automate one of three industrial situations. Your paper should follow the outline below:
1. Description of the problem.
2. Description of at least two alternate solutions you have researched, including estimated cost of equipment ​ and facility modifications and estimated rates​ of operation.
3. Description of the solution you choose and the reasons for choosing that solution.
4. Detailed description of the implementation of the chosen solution.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

Please provide me with a report on the financial rating, illastrating the concept of 1- financial rating  2 – the institution  3 – the factors  of the 3 emirates based on the country of the UNITED ARAB EMIRATES  THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES has 7 emirates which are the following:  Abu dhabi  Dubai  Ras alkhaima  Umm alquwain Al sharjah  Ajman  This report should be based on the country UNITED ARAB EMIRATESillastrating the concept of

dhabi 

Fujaira 
alkhaima 
alquwain
sharjah 

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

This is your third life skills assignment. For this assignment you will continue to work with the case of The Church of Narnia v. The ABCD Company, introducted in the first life skills assignment. Using the research you previously conducted (and the cases you found) for life skills assignment number 2 write a one to two page memorandum predicting the outcome of the The Church of Narnia v. The ABCD Company. Feel free to conduct additional research if necessary. Make sure that your memos include not only your conclusions but your reasons for who you predict will win this case. You must also prepare a comprehensive powerpoint presentation summarizing the findings of your memos.

Answer the following questions:

Concept and scope of sale of Goods as per IAS 18 (15marks)
– Background and introduction
– Scope
– Initial recognition and measurement of revenue
– Concept of Sale of good with illustrations from real companies
– Disclosure
Describe the procedure of revenue recognition from rendering services with illustrations (5marks)
Describe the procedure of revenue recognition of software companies with examples from real companies (5 marks)
Discuss the principles of Revenue Recognition of Airline Companies with examples (5 marks)
Explain the revenue recognition process of Construction Contracts with examples (10 marks)
Discuss the criteria of revenue recognition of service concession arrangements with examples (5 marks)
Discuss the criteria of revenue recognition for customer loyalty programs with examples (5marks)
Discuss the accounting treatment of revenue from agreements for the construction of Real Estate with examples (5marks)
Discuss the accounting treatment for the rendering of services and sale of goods with examples (5marks)
Explain the process of revenue recognition with examples while transferring of assets from customers (5marks)
Discuss the accounting treatment while exchanging of goods and services (5marks)
Discuss the revenue recognition criteria of Telecommunication company selling talk time through scratch cards (5marks)
Explain the revenue recognition process in case of subscription received from newspapers and magazines (5marks)
Discuss the criteria of revenue recognition with examples when goods are sold under " Sale or Return" (5marks)
Discuss the revenue recognition principles for Media Company when the advertisements are aired even if the payment is not received or received in advance (5marks)
Cite References in APA form (5marks)
Overall presentation of the information and document (5marks)

Risk management uses certain documents to track incidents. It will help you become familiar with the kind of information that goes into these documents. This week, you will create and fill in a quality improvement chart for the high-risk area you selected in Week 1 (home healthcare).

1. Design a chart to show the indicators, their measurements, and the expected and current performance. Use the template to design your chart. Further, use 5 out of the 10 standard listed. Use the template below.
2. Select one of the fictional incidents you created last week. Describe the incident under Status (attached).
3.For this incident, complete the Compliance section using fictitious data. The tracking of the indicators should correspond to the incident. That is, some failure of compliance may have led to the incident.
4.Develop a plan of correction to address the incident. Write a brief description under Plan of Correction

Use the matrix below to design your quality improvement chart. Show all the indicators you selected in the chart(attached).

Under standards, you may include areas such as the following:
IC: Surveillance, Prevention, and Control of Infection HR: Management of Human Resources
EC: Management of the Environment of Care IM: Management of Information
MM: Medication Management LD: Leadership
NPSG: National Patient Safety Goals PI: Improving Organizational Performance
PC: Provision of Care, Treatment, and Services RI: Ethics, Rights, and Responsibilities
Severity of risk may be designated as follows:
H: High risk M/H: Medium/high risk M: Medium risk L: Low risk
Compliance (in percent) may be entered on a monthly, quarterly, bi-annual, or annual schedule. The matrix here shows quarterly compliance schedule. Adjust it as necessary.

History 3675 Third Paper Topic:

 

1: To what extent do the personal testimonies of women in 20th century China mesh with historians’ accounts of the large-scale events that composed the Chinese Revolution? In the end, were women better off as a result of the Revolution?

Create an outline for the paper you will write evaluating the guideline you selected. A beginning outline is listed in the rubric. Customize this outline including details for your paper. Under each major heading, there are details of the information you should include in that section of the paper. These tips are designed to help you formulate your outline of the paper.
Evaluation of Guideline Outline Paper Rubric
Evaluation of Guideline Outline Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
view longer description
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical foundation for the topic
view longer description
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe review of the literature
view longer description
10.0 pts

Instructions:
1. Select a non-infectious disease or condition that you are interested in and look at reputable sources of
information to understand risk factors for this condition. Appropriate sources of information include, but
are not limited to the CDC, WHO, or the National Library of MedicineвЂTMs PubMed database for medical
literature. Potential project areas might be in occupational health, social or behavioral health,
environmental health, cancer, cardiovascular disease, obesity, or other chronic conditions.
2. Develop a research project proposal to study a specific testable hypothesis related to the non-infectious
disease or condition you selected. The testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable. In
developing your project proposal, you will need to ensure that you can address all of the areas required
below under “Report FormatвЂк
3. Create a written report in the format below summarizing your research proposal. This report is intended to
be short and under 2,000 words.
Example Topic:
Suppose I am interested in environmental health. I live in New Hampshire (the Granite State) and have heard that in areas
where the geology is heavily granite, ground water can become contaminated with arsenic, a potential problem for people
with private wells who are not likely to have taken arsenic mitigation action. I hypothesize that people with private wells
will have higher levels of arsenic in their blood, and will be at greatest risk for diseases associated with arsenic. The
specific testable hypothesis I choose to study is that people living in Southeastern NH (region with the most granite) who
have private groundwater wells, have a higher incidence of bladder cancer than people in the same region whose homes
are served by a public water supply. However, because it takes so long for bladder cancer to develop (possibly decades)
and because it is relatively rare, I choose a case-control study design, whereby I will identify bladder cancer cases through
the NH cancer registry (5 years worth of diagnoses) and find community controls. Because of the case-control study
design, I now revise my hypothesis to appropriately reflect the study design. My new specific testable hypothesis is that
people with bladder cancer are significantly more likely to have private groundwater wells than people without cancer.
Cases will be recruited through their oncologist or primary care provider, and controls will be recruited through a large
academic medical center with the goal of selecting 4 controls for each case. Participants will be interviewed to ask about
their source of drinking water, as well as other potential sources of arsenic such as working in certain industrial facilities
and exposure to tobacco smoke (a potential confounder because smoking also increases the risk of cancer). At the
completion of the study, I will calculate an odds ratio to describe the relationship between private well water and bladder cancer. This study example is not without methodologic problems, but it serves as an example of the thought process your
project proposal should reflect. Your proposal similarly does not need to be methodologically perfect, but it should
demonstrate your understanding of the difference between study designs and epidemiologic analysis approaches.
Report Format:
Title
п‚· Must be specific and concise (20 word limit)
п‚· Include the variables and population being studied
п‚· Example: Private groundwater wells as a source of arsenic in bladder cancer patients in New Hampshire:
A Case-Control Study
Background
п‚· 3 paragraphs generally describing the health condition (1 paragraph), why it is important (1 paragraph),
and what benefit your research project would bring such as how the information can be used to implement
a public health intervention for prevention (1 paragraph)
п‚· Cite reputable sources of information such as scientific journal articles or the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Do not cite Wikipedia or other similar sites. Follow APA format for references.
Variables
п‚· State the outcome variable
п‚· List the primary exposure variables you propose to collect in this study
п‚· List any potential confounder variables
Participants
п‚· Briefly describe who will participate in the study and how you will recruit participants, especially if you
plan to study a specific population, such as Hispanic males, for example.
Research Design
п‚· Explicitly state the study design you have selected.
п‚· How will you collect the data? Will you use interviews, observation, questionnaires, clinical
interventions, administrative data, etc.?
п‚· Are you doing qualitative or quantitative research? is it exploratory, experimental?
Data Analysis Plan
п‚· What statistics do you plan to calculate:
o Descriptive statistics (counts, frequencies, measures of central tendency, etc.)
o Inferential statistics (PearsonвЂTMs r, ANOVA, t-tests, z-tests, etc.)
o Measures of association, bivariate or multivariate statistics (Odds ratios, Risk ratios, etc.)
Syllabus Page 3 of 3
Limitations
п‚· What potential limitations do you foresee with the study you propose? What data quality, analysis, or
interpretation problems might there be?
п‚· Are there any aspects you are deliberately not going to study because they are outside of what you view
as the scope of the project?

From the Blog listed below, analyze the fundamental obstacles and opportunities for the potential implementation of your improved course of action. Next, suggest the main ways in which you might address the obstacles you have analyzed. 

Incorporate pertinent knowledge that you obtained from your previous M.Ed. Program coursework by referring to at least three (3) previously studied theorists and / or research studies to support your analysis.

Discuss one to three (1-3) pieces of evidence / artifacts from your previous coursework to support your analysis. Attach your chosen previous assignment(s) as pieces of evidence / artifact(s) to your journal entry in your Optimal Resume e-Portfolio. Identify the ID and title (for example: EDU599 – Education Capstone) of the courses for which you had produced the assignment(s).

Note: If you do not have an artifact, attach the description(s) of your chosen previous assignment(s). Artifacts do not count as part of the 1-2 page length requirement.  

From the Blog activity, evaluate the usefulness of the reflective conversation for analytical thinking and problem solving. Suggest key measures that you would take in order to make the reflective conversation a more effective and meaningful tool. Justify your response.

 

 

 

 

One (1) course of action for a real or hypothetical problem which is related to both your portfolio theme and current or prospective educational work environment. 

The interface of technology has changed the educational platform from the chalk and board to computer screens and live chats allowing professors and students to embrace their learning experience via Wi-Fi or satellite. Online education will continue to have a tremendous impact on the learning process, pedagogy and how universities will begin teaching in the not-too-distant future. One course action of a real problem in relation to technology and education is with universities having to shift from the norm of seated students listening to professors in a classroom and begin embracing innovative methods of teaching in the digital age.

One way to challenge the course action is to remain aware of advances in technology that  have had a disruptive influence on all societal sectors in the world. For instance, there are paradigm shifts in healthcare-service provisions as more and more healthcare providers begin embracing technology. The education sector is also feeling the effect of technological advances.It is therefore, prudent for all relevant stakeholders to begin analyzing how technology can be harnessed to potentially improve pedagogy and effective learning outcomes.