Let China sleep, warned Napoleon, for when she wakes, she will shake the world. Napoleon's prediction is now coming true, as China's economic growth has helped aid in its climb to power. 

In 150-200 words, describe the principal effects of China's increasing prosperity on U.S.- China relations.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

The textbook for this assignment comes from: Logistics engineering and management.

1. Select a topic discussed in our textbook in which you will demonstrate critical thinking at a higher-level as noted in APUS's Assignment Rubrics for Undergraduate 300-400 level work. 

2. Submit your topic along with a brief description to the Instructor via e-mail for approval.

 3. The page length requirement for your paper is 6-7 double spaced pages. In addition you need to provide a cover sheet which, includes; the course title and name, paper title, student name and student ID.

4. References will include your text and 3-4 additional sources.  

5. Cite your work in accordance with APA guidelines.  

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

Competency

This competency will allow you to demonstrate your ability and skill in applying the concepts of Nash equilibrium.

Instructions

A local law firm has hired G & B Consulting to help determine a business strategy. There is a competing firm in the area as well, and the first firm suspects that they are also reconsidering their business strategy by going to a different consulting firm. The choice that each firm is faced with is whether or not to lower their rates to attract more customers. If neither company changes prices, both firms continue to make a profit. If one prices low while the other does not, the firm that prices low will take all of the business. If both firms price low, they will continue to split the market, but at reduced profits. More specifically, if both firms price high, they each can expect yearly profits of $15 million. If Firm 1 prices high while Firm 2 prices low, Firm 1 should only expect profits of $5 million while Firm 2 should expect profits of $25 million. If they choose the reverse, the payoffs would be switched accordingly. If both firms choose to price low, they should both expect profits of $5 million.

Part 1: You decide to develop your strategy by creating a payoff matrix for this scenario and finding any pure strategy equilibriums that exist. Write up a detailed solution on finding the pure strategy equilibriums, and include the payoff matrix you created that will be added to the final report to be delivered to the client.

Part 2: Your coworker who is also working on this project wants to advise the firm that they should price low no matter what, as it will give the chance of obtaining the highest profits. The two of you need to determine whose strategy is better and why before bringing your analysis to the client. Compose an email to your coworker that explains which solution you would choose and why you would choose it, along with any reason for disregarding either solution.

Part 3: Create a report that details how you would advise the firm. Be sure it includes all of the relevant technical information you used to reach your conclusion, as well as a plainly stated strategy that you advise.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

Develop: a Project Management Plan Project Charter for Target, this project entails the process of an store / building expansion which  added additional areas to create the transformation from a regular  general Target Store into a Target Supercenter Store. Target Store has  been on-going in this process to turn "all" of its regular stores into  Supercenters. 

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper featuring the following elements:

Narrative project description

Problem and result statement

Mission justification

Project scope statement

Major deliverables

High-level milestones for significant events

Applicable technical requirements, assumptions, or constraints

APA Paper Format

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

Question 1 : How might risk taking by emerging adults be both destructive and beneficial? Provide specific examples for both destructive and beneficial risk taking in your discussion.

Question 2: What generally happens to sibling relationships over the course of adulthood? Provide two examples to support your answer.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​

1. Explain why e-Business scenarios are generally more complex than traditional business scenarios. (1 Page)

2. Discuss the interrelationships of the relevant elements, such as business goals, organization of business, and use of information technology. (1 Page)

3a. Discuss the role of e-Business in practical business applications.

3b. Identify techniques and tools that can be used to evaluate the driving forces of e-Business

3c. Assess e-Business influence on businesses and how it provides a competitive advantage.

(3a,3b,3c – 1 Page)

(3 Pages, not include cover and reference page)

Due in 48 Hours

Include in text citation

Include reference page

APA Style Format

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!

Responsible Stewardship: Our Creator blesses us with an abundance of resources. We foster a spirit of service to employ our resources to university and community development. We must be resourceful. We must optimize and apply all of the resources of our community to fulfill Saint Leo University's mission and goals.”  (Excerpt from Syllabus)

Writing Guidelines:

Synthesize the concepts learned in your readings with Saint Leo’s Core Values, the lectures, journals, and the topics assigned. The papers must be 2 pages long, double spaced, with size 12 point, Times New Roman font. Please use the rules of APA style for your cover page, citations and parenthetical formats, and reference page.  

Topic 2: Consider examples of market failures. What role do you think the government should play in regulating market structures? Provide examples of the government’s involvement in regulating market structures and the application of responsible stewardship. 

TOPIC 3:Consider public choice and the core value of responsible stewardship. What is the link between self-interest and the core value of responsible stewardship as it relates to individuals, businesses, and governments?

1. Select at least one quote from each reading this week. (You can use bullets this week if you prefer.) There are 4 readings so there should be 4 quotes.

2. Explain why the quote is important or interesting.

3. Discuss what you learned about assessment in math/science/STEM/STEAM this week.

300 words

apa format

3 in text citations

Use attachment for reading and reference and the following:

Keeley,   P. (2014). Habitat change: Formative assessment of a cautionary word. Science   and 

Children,   51(7), 26-27.

Schleigh,   S. (2014). Assessments in the arguments. Science and Children, 51(8), 46-53.

Zissman,   T. (2013). Measuring success: Second graders design, build, test, and improve   tools 

to   map a waterway. Science and Children, 51(2), 68-74. 

Californians   Dedicated to Education Foundation. (2014) INNOVATE: A Blueprint for Science, Technology, Engineering, and   Mathematics in California Public Education – A report by State Superintendent   of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson’s STEM Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf 

Presenting Evidence and Questioning Witnesses

1- Mrs. Jane Bekos, Misericordia's medical staff coordinator (appointed April 1973), testifying from the hospital records, noted that Salinsky's appointment to the medical staff was by the then hospital administrator, David A. Scott, Sr., on June 22, 1973.

2- Mrs. Bekos, testified that although her hospital administrative duties entailed obtaining all the information available, she failed to contact any of the references in Salinsky's case. In her testimony she attempted to justify her failure to investigate Salinsky's application because she believed she had been a member of the medical staff prior to her employment in April 1973,

3-. At trial, the only member of Misericordia's medical staff executive committee * 715 to testify was Dr. Louis Maxey who stated that he did not recall ever being at any meeting where Salinsky's application was even considered.

4. Further, Walter Harden, Family Hospital's administrator, testified that no one from Misericordia, much less an executive committee member, contacted him in regard to Salinsky's statement in his application that he had orthopedic privileges at that institution. In fact, Mercy grants this point, stating "In this particular case, the defendant-appellant-petitioner hospital has admitted all along he did not check Dr. Salinsky's credentials …"

. The administrators of both Northwest General Hospital and New Berlin Memorial Hospital testified that their records indicated Dr. Salinsky had never been associated with their hospitals. Also, Walter Harden, the administrator of Family Hospital where Dr. Salinsky had medical staff privileges from 1954 to 1973, testified that Salinsky was neither board certified, nor board eligible in the field of orthopedic surgery. This testimony contradicts the following language contained in the preceding sentences Salinsky's signature on his Mercy application:

Furthermore, I believe that I am qualified to perform all procedures for which I, and I am not entitled to any procedures for which I am not certified. have requested privileges. "

With respect to the latter, Dr. Sam Neeseman, a clinical professor of orthopedic surgery at the Medical College of Wisconsin and a board certified orthopedic surgeon with surgical privileges at numerous Milwaukee area hospitals testified that he had conversed with a number of orthopedic surgeons in the Milwaukee area to Dr. Salinsky's credentials and stated that the vast majority of Dr. Salinsky's peers in the Milwaukee metropolitan area agreed that Salinsky was not a competent orthopedic surgeon.

6- Drs Salinsky and Maxey testified for the defense. Salinsky contradicted the testimony of the administrators of Northwest General Hospital and New Berlin Memorial Hospital, stating that he had consultant privileges with those hospitals. He has also testified that he did not approve his own appointment to Misericordia's medical staff and attempted to explain his signature in the approval section of his application, stating his signature appeared there "Because I was asked to sign the papers, and I signed the papers . Salinsky further stated that his appointment to Misericordia's medical staff was approved because other members of the staff recommended him.

7- Dr. Maxey, as noted above, was the only member of Misericordia's medical staff executive committee in 1973 to testify at the trial. Besides testifying that he could not recall having ever participated in the review of Salinsky's application, Maxey stated that he was familiar with Salinsky's ability as an orthopedic surgeon prior to the time Salinsky applied for staff privileges at Misericordia.

8- Maxey testified that the fact that other hospitals had denied, suspended, limited or revoked Salinsky's privileges would not influence his belief in this regard, stating:

"… if I personally had contacted a hospital and the contact point had been given to me by Dr. Salinsky, or any doctor, * 721 particularly a surgeon, I would have a great deal of reservations to what the source of the criticism was in view of the medical hospital politics that exists today, and so it would not have swayed my opinion relative to his competency at all. "

In Ferguson, supra, the plaintiff was admitted to the hospital under the care of Dr. Gonyaw, an osteopathic neurosurgeon. The plaintiff was suffering from a back injury at the time of admission to the hospital and his injury was apparently aggravated by the treatment received in the hospital at the hand of Gonyaw, as he alleged that Gonyaw failed to use the standard requirement of care in treating the same He alleged that the hospital was negligent in granting staff privileges to Dr. Gonyaw claiming that a reasonable and prudent hospital would have determined that Gonyaw had inadequate training to be able to practice neurosurgery in his facilities. I have established that the hospital had not verified the facts on Dr. Gonyaw's application for staff privileges and in fact they did not even follow normal procedures, ie, [t] here were no letters in the file cross-checking his references or his past associations. Neither were there notices of telephone calls to his references or past associates as the administrator testified there * 732 should have been if such telephone calls had been made. "The Michigan Court of Appeals held that the hospital was negligent in this regard stating (p.667):

"One of the hospital's primary functions is to screen its staff of physicians to 'insure' that only competent physicians are allowed to practice in the hospital.

10-. Dr. Neeseman stated that he had personally reviewed some of Salinsky's cases and found that they "were not the work of a competent orthopedic surgeon."

11- specialty. Dr. Sam Neeseman stated that a hospital's credentials committee, with knowledge of such events would not, in the exercise of ordinary care, have approved the applicant's request for orthopedic privileges.

Presenting Evidence and Questioning Witnesses

1- Mrs. Jane Bekos, Misericordia's medical staff coordinator (appointed April of 1973), testifying from the hospital records, noted that Salinsky's appointment to the medical staff was recommended by the then hospital administrator, David A. Scott, Sr., on June 22, 1973.

2- Mrs. Bekos, testified that although her hospital administrative duties entailed obtaining all the information available regarding an applicant from the hospitals and doctors referred to in the application for medical staff privileges, she failed to contact any of the references in Salinsky's case. In her testimony she attempted to justify her failure to investigate Salinsky's application because she believed he had been a member of the medical staff prior to her employment in April of 1973,[

3- . At trial, the only member of Misericordia's medical staff executive committee *715 to testify was Dr. Louis Maxey who stated that he did not recall ever being at any meeting where Salinsky's application was even considered.

4- Further, Walter Harden, Family Hospital's administrator, testified that no one from Misericordia, much less an executive committee member, contacted him in regard to Salinsky's statement in his application that he had orthopedic privileges at that institution. In fact, Misericordia concedes this point, stating "In this particular case, the defendant-appellant-petitioner hospital has admitted all along it did not check Dr. Salinsky's credentials. . . ."

. The administrators of both Northwest General Hospital and New Berlin Memorial Hospital testified that their records indicated Dr. Salinsky had never been associated with their hospitals. Also, Walter Harden, the administrator of Family Hospital where Dr. Salinsky had medical staff privileges from 1954 to 1973, testified that Salinsky was neither board certified, nor board eligible in the field of orthopedic surgery. This testimony contradicts the following language contained in the sentences preceding Salinsky's signature on his Misericordia application:

"I have not requested privileges for any procedures for which I am not certified. Furthermore, I realize that certification by a board does not necessarily qualify me to perform certain procedures. However, I believe that I am qualified to perform all procedures for which I haverequested privileges."

5- With respect to the latter, Dr. Sam Neeseman, a clinical professor of orthopedic surgery at the Medical College of Wisconsin and a board certified orthopedic surgeon with surgical privileges at numerous Milwaukee area hospitals testified that he had conversed with a number of orthopedic surgeons in the Milwaukee area regarding Dr. Salinsky's credentials and stated that the vast majority of Dr. Salinsky's peers in the metropolitan Milwaukee area agreed that Salinsky was not a competent orthopedic surgeon.

6- Drs. Salinsky and Maxey testified for the defense. Salinsky contradicted the testimony of the administrators of Northwest General Hospital and New Berlin Memorial Hospital, stating that he had consultant privileges with those hospitals. He also testified that he did not approve his own appointment to Misericordia's medical staff and attempted to explain away his signature in the approval section of his application, stating his signature appeared there "Because I was asked to sign the papers, and I signed the papers. . . ." Salinsky further stated that his appointment to Misericordia's medical staff was approved because other members of the staff recommended him.

7- Dr. Maxey, as noted above, was the only member of Misericordia's medical staff executive committee in 1973 to testify at the trial. Besides testifying that he could not recall ever having participated in the review of Salinsky's application, Maxey stated that he was familiar with Salinsky's ability as an orthopedic surgeon prior to the time Salinsky applied for staff privileges at Misericordia.

8- Maxey testified that the fact that other hospitals had denied, suspended, limited or revoked Salinsky's privileges would not influence his belief in this regard, stating:

". . . if I personally had contacted a hospital and the contact point such as an administrator had given me a negative opinion relative to Dr. Salinsky, or any doctor, *721 particularly a surgeon, I would have a great deal of reservations as to what the source of the criticism was in view of the medical hospital politics that exist today, and so it would not have swayed my opinion relative to his competency at all."

9-  In Ferguson, supra, the plaintiff was admitted to the defendant hospital under the care of Dr. Gonyaw, an osteopathic neurosurgeon. The plaintiff was suffering from a back injury at the time of admission to the hospital and his injury was apparently aggravated by the treatment received in the hospital at the hand of Gonyaw, as he alleged that Gonyaw failed to use the requisite standard of care in treating the same. He alleged that the hospital was negligent in granting staff privileges to Dr. Gonyaw claiming that a reasonable and prudent hospital would have determined that Gonyaw had inadequate training to be allowed to practice neurosurgery in its facilities. He established that the hospital had not verified the facts on Dr. Gonyaw's application for staff privileges and in fact they did not even follow normal procedures, i.e., "[t]here were no letters in the file cross-checking his references or his past associations. Neither were there notations of telephone calls to his references or past associates as the administrator testified there *732 should have been if such telephone calls had been made." Id. 64 Mich. App. at 697, 236 N.W.2d at 550. The Michigan Court of Appeals held that the hospital was negligent in this regard stating (p. 697):

"One of the hospital's primary functions is to screen its staff of physicians to `insure' that only competent physicians are allowed to practice in the hospital.

10- . Dr. Neeseman stated that he had personally reviewed some of Salinsky's cases and found that they "were not the work of a competent orthopedic surgeon."

11- specialty. Dr. Sam Neeseman stated that a hospital's credentials committee, with knowledge of such events would not, in the exercise of ordinary care, have approved the applicant's request for orthopedic privileges.

 Think of an organization you have worked for or one with which you are very familiar.  Diagnose the need for change and present a plan to transform the organization, utilizing Kotter’s 8-Step Approach. 

Include the following sections headings and additional sections as needed:

1. Introduction

2. Company Overview

3. Diagnosis

4. Kotter's 8-Step Approach

5. Conclusion

Writing the Paper
Must be eight- to- ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

1. Must include a title page that includes:

     a. Title of paper

     b. Student’s name

     c. Course name and number

     d. Instructor’s name

     e. Date submitted

2. Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.

3. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

4. Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.

5. Must use at least five scholarly sources.

6. Must use APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document all sources.

7. Must include, on the final page, a Reference Page that is completed according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

​Need a similar essay? We have qualified writers who can assist. Click ORDER NOW to get a special bonus- Up to 18% Discount Offer!!!​