Archive for June 2nd, 2022

James Cameron and auteur theory

Body Paragraph(s): Distinguishable Personality

        Using examples from your chosen directors two films, identify the traits that are indicative of that directors stylistic personality.
        Discuss the genre or genres in which your chosen director primarily works (or if your chosen director bends genre conventions, address how).
        Using analysis of your examples, describe the consistent hallmarks of your chosen directors work.

        Body Paragraph(s): Interior Meaning

        Address the type of stories your chosen director tends to focus on. Do these stories convey similar themes?
        Elaborate on the thematic elements of your chosen directors two films and how they convey a deeper truth or meaning.
        Using examples of acting, cinematography, editing, argue for the multiple ways in which your chosen director is able to convey consistent and meaningful themes throughout the two selected films

James Cameron and auteur theory

Body Paragraph(s): Distinguishable Personality

        Using examples from your chosen directors two films, identify the traits that are indicative of that directors stylistic personality.
        Discuss the genre or genres in which your chosen director primarily works (or if your chosen director bends genre conventions, address how).
        Using analysis of your examples, describe the consistent hallmarks of your chosen directors work.

        Body Paragraph(s): Interior Meaning

        Address the type of stories your chosen director tends to focus on. Do these stories convey similar themes?
        Elaborate on the thematic elements of your chosen directors two films and how they convey a deeper truth or meaning.
        Using examples of acting, cinematography, editing, argue for the multiple ways in which your chosen director is able to convey consistent and meaningful themes throughout the two selected films

PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK IN 12 HOURS or LESS

 In this course, we are currently working with the Blackboard LMS. Considering what you have learned in this unit about LMSs, how do you feel about Blackboard? You can consider criteria such as functionality, visual appeal, ease of use, accessibility, or anything else that you feel is important in your evaluation. 

Reviewing market risk, Beta, the security market line, and CAPM on 10k report

I need assistance with research on a 10k report for a particular company. The research is based on market risk, Beta, the security market line, and CAPM. I also need two responses for peers on the same topic ( based on their post). 

American’s myth on poverty

 need help with work not less than 350 words 

– What did you find striking/interesting about the podcast? 
– Can you relate to the idea of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps?” How so?
– How does the textbook define negative liberty and positive liberty? Which type of liberty appeals more to you as an individual?
– Did this podcast shift your viewpoint on the myths of poverty in the U.S.? If so, in what ways? If not, which components of the discussion of poverty still ring true for you? 

Production Paper Assignment #2

Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mREzIBmOpBY. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

Production Paper Assignment #2

Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mREzIBmOpBY. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

110/p3

Create a remediation plan to map vulnerabilities and risks found to appropriate remediation efforts. Provide a recommendation for the fixes and include an explanation of any resources you may need (i.e., funding, expertise, etc.). Use Appendix Q from the Howard textbook to assist you in this exercise.
nsert the Remediation Plan as Appendix 4 in the SSP.

Production Paper Assignment #1

Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo8CmwIKiDw. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

Production Paper Assignment #1

Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo8CmwIKiDw. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

error: Content is protected !!