Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo8CmwIKiDw. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

Look at this streaming theatrical performance and write a production paper.  streaming theatrical performance link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo8CmwIKiDw. Below is information on how to write the production papers and when they are due.

Paper Requirements:

Use the paper outline I provide for you in each Production Paper Assignment.
Papers must be 12 pt. Times, double spaced format.
Papers must be at least 2-3 pages long
The paper is a review/critique of a play you saw, so look at examples of reviews and critiques to use as a guideline.
Aspects of the performance you should be commenting on are the text, story, particular actor performances, costumes, lighting, set design, music…anything else you want.
Give your opinion, possibly what you would do different if you didn’t like it and whether or not you recommend this show for people to see.
Do not just write, “I liked it” or “The acting was good”.  Break it down…what was good about it?  Why did you like it?  Be specific and mention what the costumes looked like and why you think the designer made those choices and same thing with the other designers and their designs.
When writing about the actors, use their real names from the credits to talk about the choices they made in creating their characters.
Italicize the title of the play in your paper and make sure to mention what theatre produced this play or what company produced this particular production of it.

Paper Outline:                                                                                                                                 

I. Introduction

        -Includes opening paragraph introducing play and production you will be discussing.

        -Includes your point of view and opinion.

        -Brief synopsis of plot/story, like 2-3 sentences.

II. Supporting Paragraph #1 (Design Elements):

  Focus on 2 or 3 design elements, like costumes, props, sound, set, lights and how they support or dont support the play or the directors vision.  Describe the elements and discuss perhaps why they were the way they were and if it worked for you.  Elaborate on what you saw and analyze its effect on the show.

III. Supporting Paragraph #2 (Acting):

      Focus on 2 or 3 actors and discuss their performance.  Describe what worked or what didnt work for you and the choices these actors made in creating their characters. Use the actor’s names when discussing their performance because it is their acting choices you are critiquing, not the character’s.

IV. Supporting Paragraph #3 (Direction/ Playwriting):

      Focus on what you think the directors vision was and whether it works or not.  Or elements of the story/writing.  Lots of room here.

V.  Conclusion:

Wrap it up.

Textbook: Fry, H. S. K. (2022). Handbook for teaching and learning In higher education : Enhancing academic practice, 4Th Edition. T&F INDIA. ISBN: 9780367240011. Read chapters 5, 6 & 7.

Question #1 Must be at least 300 words.

Fry (2015) provided an overview of what students should learn in this particular context. Please synthesize this overview and provide your reflections on these observations. Are there observations in keeping with your current view of student learning in higher education? Which elements were similar and which might have been in conflict with your previous presuppositions about learning in higher education?

Question #2 Must be at least 300 words.

In this learning module, you had a chance to read some reflections from our contributing authors on the role of teaching, lecturing, and providing direct support to students in their attempt to embrace the content of the learning objectives in higher education. What did this examination help you to understand about the 

Content

1. In this assignment, you will analyze the relationship between ethics and health care research. You will demonstrate your research skills by applying them to an ethical scenario you choose. While most health care managers do not conduct research, being able to evaluate research and apply it to situations, such as the ethical concerns presented in this assignment, are a valuable part of the effective management and adaptable leadership needed in the health care industry.

   Preparation
   Select 1 of the following ethical scenarios:

   • A company uses patient DNA for research without the patient’s knowledge or consent.
   • A nonprofit organization sells fetal tissue for research. (Note: Do not assume this is illegal; this may be legal in some states or jurisdictions.)
   • Management invites researchers onto a health care research project who do not have the institutional review board’s (IRB) approval or exemption.
   • An oncology clinical trials coordinator is conducting a research study and selects a relative who has the cancer under investigation. The relative is placed in the group receiving the experimental drug.
   • Search the for at least 3 peer-reviewed research articles that relate to the ethical concerns of your chosen scenario or to the process step at which ethical issues may have begun.

     Assignment
     15-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes in which you:

   • Identify the ethical concern and at what step in the scenario the ethical concern(s) occurred.
   • Explain how evidence-based research can eliminate or minimize ethical concerns in the health care industry.
   • Compare and contrast research studies and quality-management projects as they relate to the health care industry.
   • Explain external factors that have an impact on the ethical concern in the scenario.
   • Include a title slide, detailed speaker notes explaining the content for each slide, and a reference slide. The title slide and reference slide are not part of the count.

     Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed references to support your presentation.

     Format your citations and references according to APA guidelines. 

   • Research Article Links
   •  https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A245813211/AONE?u=uphoenix&sid=ebsco&xid=9bf69aed 
   •  https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?qt=TI~%22An+effective+multisource+informed+consent+procedure+for+research+and+clinical+practice%3A+an+observational+study+of+patient+understanding+and+awareness+of+their+roles+as+research+stakeholders+in+a+cancer+biobank%22~~AU~Cervo%2C+Silvia~~IU~1~~PU~%22BMC+Medical+Ethics%22~~VO~14&sw=w&ty=as&it=search&sid=bookmark-OVIC&p=OVIC&s=RELEVANCE&u=uphoenix&v=2.1&asid=3e61cacc 
   •  https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A114007453/CSIC?u=uphoenix&sid=ebsco&xid=5983d55a
      

• As you read the short story on its own terms, what adjustments did you have to make to continue reading? Did you read things that you did not want to read? Did you read anything that conflicted with or challenged your own ideas or feelings? Please explain and give at least one example. 
• As you read, you should have assumed that there is a reason for everything in the text. What details did you notice that you thought were interesting, peculiar, or seemed significant in some way? Name at least three details and explain what impact they had on you as a reader. 
• As you read, you should also have remembered that literary texts exist in time and that time changes. What is your sense of when the story might have taken place, and how did you arrive at this conclusion? How does your knowledge of the time period impact your reading, or does it make you reflect on anything about our current time period? 

1. Only considering grades from 40 to 100, comment on the shape of each distribution and what it means for general class performance.
2. With reference to the shape of the distribution AND summary statistics, which course seems to be more difficult and why?

If and when (under what circumstances) do you think the spread of McDonald’s, Starbucks, and other global food chains is a threat to local cultures, diets, foodways, and health around the world? 

ansmer:  “write about mcdontlad hamburger are bad for our body, also many people start to love eating fast food rather than cook. no source no reference, must be using your own word, im not a good english speak, so please using the simple and easy english word.

If and when (under what circumstances) do you think the spread of McDonald’s, Starbucks, and other global food chains is a threat to local cultures, diets, foodways, and health around the world? 

ansmer:  “write about mcdontlad hamburger are bad for our body, also many people start to love eating fast food rather than cook. no source no reference, must be using your own word, im not a good english speak, so please using the simple and easy english word.

If and when (under what circumstances) do you think the spread of McDonald’s, Starbucks, and other global food chains is a threat to local cultures, diets, foodways, and health around the world? 

ansmer:  “write about mcdontlad hamburger are bad for our body, also many people start to love eating fast food rather than cook. no source no reference, must be using your own word, im not a good english speak, so please using the simple and easy english word.

If and when (under what circumstances) do you think the spread of McDonald’s, Starbucks, and other global food chains is a threat to local cultures, diets, foodways, and health around the world? 

ansmer:  “write about mcdontlad hamburger are bad for our body, also many people start to love eating fast food rather than cook. no source no reference, must be using your own word, im not a good english speak, so please using the simple and easy english word.